I've found a number of interesting index funds, of which a lot are run by Vanguard. However, since I'm diversifying my investments between index funds, it seems sensible that I'd want to make sure all my eggs aren't in the same basket with the companies that run them, too.

Isn't it possible that someone could embezzle all the money from Vanguard, or there could be some other terrible occurrance, causing them to collapse? Assuming that's a possibility, however small, isn't it sensible to invest in index funds run by a number of companies to spread that risk around?

(I'm not trying to call out Vanguard specifically here - they're just the most visible company I found, and I'm sure that there's no more chance of something bad happening to them than anyone else.)


  • 1
    No one thought banks could go under before 2008, and then they did. Commented Nov 8, 2016 at 14:54
  • You can read everything about risks in each prospect for every paper you buy. Risks always exist and companies are spending your money, nobody guarantees that it will pay off.
    – sanaris
    Commented Aug 15, 2018 at 10:18

2 Answers 2


It is true that this is possible, however, it's very remote in the case of the large and reputable fund companies such as Vanguard.

FDIC insurance protects against precisely this for bank accounts, but mutual funds and ETFs do not have an equivalent to FDIC insurance.

One thing that does help you in the case of a mutual fund or ETF is that you indirectly (through the fund) own actual assets. In a cash account at a bank, you have a promise from the bank to pay, and then the bank can go off and use your money to make loans. You don't in any sense own the bank's loans. With a fund, the fund company cannot (legally) take your money out of the fund, except to pay the expense ratio. They have to use your money to buy stocks, bonds, or whatever the fund invests in. Those assets are then owned by the fund.

Legally, a mutual fund is a special kind of company defined in the Investment Company Act of 1940, and is a separate company from the investment advisor (such as Vanguard): http://www.sec.gov/answers/mfinvco.htm

Funds have their own boards, and in principle a fund board can even fire the company advising the fund, though this is not likely since boards aren't usually independent. (a quick google found this article for more, maybe someone can find a better one: http://www.marketwatch.com/story/mutual-fund-independent-board-rule-all-but-dead)

If Vanguard goes under, the funds could continue to exist and get a new adviser, or could be liquidated with investors receiving whatever the assets are worth.

Of course, all this legal stuff doesn't help you with outright fraud. If a fund's adviser says it bought the S&P 500, but really some guy bought himself a yacht, Madoff-style, then you have a problem. But a huge well-known ETF has auditors, tons of different employees, lots of brokerage and exchange traffic, etc. so to me at least it's tough to imagine a risk here. With a small fund company with just a few people - and there are lots of these! - then there's more risk, and you'd want to carefully look at what independent agent holds their assets, who their auditors are, and so forth.

With regular mutual funds (not ETFs) there are more issues with diversifying across fund companies:

  • becomes tough to rebalance
  • you may not qualify for lower expenses and fees (Vanguard and probably many others lower your fees if you have more assets with them)
  • more risk of someone breaking in to your online accounts just because you have more
  • increased complexity is never good, since it leads to procrastinating and less clarity

With ETFs, there probably isn't much downside to diversifying since you could buy them all from one brokerage account. Maybe it even happens naturally if you pick the best ETFs you can find. Personally, I would just pick the best ETFs and not worry about advisor diversity.

Update: maybe also deserving a mention are exchange-traded notes (ETNs). An ETN's legal structure is more like the bank account, minus the FDIC insurance of course. It's an IOU from the company that runs the ETN, where they promise to pay back the value of some index. There's no investment company as with a fund, and therefore you don't own a share of any actual assets. If the ETN's sponsor went bankrupt, you would indeed have a problem, much more so than if an ETF's sponsor went bankrupt.

  • Awesome answer. Possibly stupid follow-up question - is it worth diversfying brokerage companies? If I went with a single company, could they steal all my hard-earned monnies somehow? (Not that I'd have enough to make it worth anyone's while, really.)
    – Colen
    Commented Feb 23, 2011 at 16:58
  • 2
    A brokerage account should be protected by SIPC and by regulators as long as it's a reputable broker, and you aren't a millionaire. This article goes into it a bit: kiplinger.com/columns/ask/archive/2008/q0721.htm
    – Havoc P
    Commented Feb 23, 2011 at 17:06
  • 1
    I think the thing to really watch for is "guy I met at church/the Y/wherever" asset managers, and the many tiny mutual fund companies with only a few employees. Clearly most of these people are honest and many are very good, but these sort of small scale operations are where it's easier to hide fraud, so checking them out is important. Madoff wasn't so different; wealthy customers, but they would meet him socially and not do any due diligence, and he had very few employees to blow the whistle. The larger companies tend to take your money in legal rather than criminal ways. ;-)
    – Havoc P
    Commented Feb 23, 2011 at 17:14
  • 1
    Actually, Vanguard is sort of unusual. It is owned by the investors in the funds that it sells. I don't know if this makes it more or less vulnerable to financial issues. Vanguard on ownership
    – Xalorous
    Commented Nov 9, 2016 at 20:28

Your thinking is a little extreme! V could go under... but chances are very remote. Similarly I can't answer if someone asks if the Feds can go under. Looking at our awesome debt levels and no way to dig out of it, that is definitely a possibility. But will it happen? Probably no.

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .