Timeline for Have companies gone bankcrupt shortly after their stock going up?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
14 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 4 at 16:31 | comment | added | Reinstate Monica | @Nowhereman Massive fraud will do that. But not sure it's answer-worthy. | |
| Dec 30, 2023 at 23:26 | comment | added | Nowhere man | @ReinstateMonica you should make an answer with that one, it took about 18 months for Enron to go to a high valuation point to its lowest… | |
| Dec 16, 2023 at 0:09 | answer | added | gnasher729 | timeline score: 1 | |
| Dec 6, 2023 at 8:34 | comment | added | tim | It could only double those profits if you assume they produced exactly 0 value (or about negative 150 million, if you include the layoff costs). | |
| Dec 6, 2023 at 6:48 | comment | added | user58697 | Check out the story of Nortel, especially the section Optical boom and bust. | |
| Dec 5, 2023 at 23:01 | comment | added | jaskij |
@njzk2 the people cost (280M) is yearly, where the 70M is for one quarter. 280M / 4 = 70M.
|
|
| Dec 5, 2023 at 21:12 | comment | added | njzk2 | "which could approximately double those profits" in what world? (also isn't that x5?) | |
| Dec 5, 2023 at 19:47 | comment | added | Reinstate Monica | Enron.......... | |
| Dec 5, 2023 at 18:58 | comment | added | Nuclear Hoagie | Note that a stock doesn't go up because the company made a good profitability move - it goes up because the company made what people think was a good profitability move, which doesn't always turn out to be correct. | |
| Dec 5, 2023 at 18:25 | history | became hot network question | |||
| Dec 5, 2023 at 11:13 | answer | added | mhoran_psprep | timeline score: 7 | |
| Dec 5, 2023 at 11:06 | answer | added | keshlam | timeline score: 2 | |
| S Dec 5, 2023 at 10:22 | review | First questions | |||
| Dec 5, 2023 at 11:18 | |||||
| S Dec 5, 2023 at 10:22 | history | asked | Nowhere man | CC BY-SA 4.0 |