Skip to main content
12 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Mar 3, 2021 at 17:10 history bumped CommunityBot This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed.
Nov 3, 2020 at 16:02 history bumped CommunityBot This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed.
Oct 4, 2020 at 15:47 answer added CQM timeline score: 1
Oct 4, 2020 at 15:03 history bumped CommunityBot This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed.
Jun 6, 2020 at 14:08 history bumped CommunityBot This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed.
Feb 7, 2020 at 14:02 history bumped CommunityBot This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed.
Jan 8, 2020 at 22:54 comment added Bob Baerker You're making the incorrect assumption that because there are no borrowable shares that there must be lots of pent up demand for additional shares to short. That may or may not be true. You are aslo incorrectly assuming that if the short interest is low, the stock should rise. Understand that for every seller, there is a buyer and vice versa. If the volume of these opposing forces is in equilibrium, share price will be stagnant regardless of the amount of borrowable shares available or the amount of shorting that is occurring.
Jan 8, 2020 at 13:49 history edited RonJohn CC BY-SA 4.0
added 28 characters in body
Jan 8, 2020 at 13:45 history edited Nosjack CC BY-SA 4.0
edited for clarity
Jan 8, 2020 at 0:05 answer added David Schwartz timeline score: 0
Jan 7, 2020 at 22:05 review First posts
Jan 8, 2020 at 15:51
Jan 7, 2020 at 22:04 history asked Warf CC BY-SA 4.0