Timeline for Can my insurance company raise my rates for asking them about a claim I may not file?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
4 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Nov 12, 2017 at 18:42 | vote | accept | techturtle | ||
Nov 10, 2017 at 8:21 | comment | added | TripeHound | @DStanley They presumably have an actuarial figure for the "expected cost of damages caused by a 16-year-old" (averaged over Bentleys and Yugos). My guess is in a totally fair world, the premiums should only rise if there is evidence to suggest that actual claims will exceed this expected value... so the value of this claim could play a part, but, I would say, only if there is other evidence that this is not an "expected" claim (e.g. if this was the fourth such claim in as many months; over the "average" of a 16-year-old). | |
Nov 9, 2017 at 21:54 | comment | added | D Stanley | Thanks for adding an answer, that's good information. The last bullet is interesting, though. I would have thought that your rates were based on the probability of future accidents and that the cost of the prior accident would be irrelevant. Whether you hit a Bentley or a Yugo, your changes of a future accident are the same. Perhaps they're trying to make up for additional costs that they did not factor into their risk analysis, though. | |
Nov 9, 2017 at 20:44 | history | answered | techturtle | CC BY-SA 3.0 |