Its tempting to think of a corporation as a real thing, because in many respects it seems to be. But it isn't a corporeal thing (despite the root word of the name). It may own corporeal things, and employ corporeal people, but it is not itself a real thing.

Borrowing heavily from Prof Joseph Heath:

It might be better to think of a corporation as the nexus of 4 separate entities: investors who provide capital, employees who do the work, suppliers who provide raw material, etc, and customers who purchase the products or services the corporation buys.

In different organizations the 'owners' are different: in co-ops its the suppliers, mutual insurance companies the customers, in employee-owned companies the employees, but in 90% of cases (including Monsanto) its the investors.

The investors who provided capital by buying shares of stock are the owners, and will be compensated. This frequently happens indirectly: you may own Monsanto stock through a mutual fund or other such aggregate which means that your mutual fund will get the money. Whether that winds up being a profit or loss is more complicated.

It's tempting to think of a corporation as a real thing, because in many respects it seems to be. But it isn't a corporeal thing (despite the root word of the name). It may own corporeal things, and employ corporeal people, but it is not itself a real thing.

Borrowing heavily from Prof Joseph Heath:

It might be better to think of a corporation as the nexus of four separate entities: investors who provide capital, employees who do the work, suppliers who provide raw material, etc., and customers who purchase the products or services the corporation buys.

In different organizations the 'owners' are different: in co-ops it's the suppliers, mutual insurance companies the customers, in employee-owned companies the employees, but in 90% of cases (including Monsanto) it's the investors.

The investors who provided capital by buying shares of stock are the owners, and will be compensated. This frequently happens indirectly: You may own Monsanto stock through a mutual fund or other such aggregate which means that your mutual fund will get the money. Whether that winds up being a profit or loss is more complicated.

Its tempting to think of a corporation as a real thing, because in many respects it is. But it isn't a corporeal thing (despite the root word of the name). It may own corporeal things, and employ corporeal people, but it is not itself a real thing.

Borrowing heavily from Prof Joseph Heath:

It might be better to think of a corporation as the nexus of 4 separate entities: investors who provide capital, employees who do the work, suppliers who provide raw material, etc, and customers who purchase the products or services the corporation buys.

In different organizations the 'owners' are different: in co-ops its the suppliers, mutual insurance companies the customers, in employee-owned companies the employees, but in 90% of cases (including Monsanto) its the investors.

The investors who provided capital by buying shares of stock are the owners, and will be compensated. This frequently happens indirectly: you may own Monsanto stock through a mutual fund or other such aggregate which means that your mutual fund will get the money. Whether that winds up being a profit or loss is more complicated.

Its tempting to think of a corporation as a real thing, because in many respects it seems to be. But it isn't a corporeal thing (despite the root word of the name). It may own corporeal things, and employ corporeal people, but it is not itself a real thing.

Borrowing heavily from Prof Joseph Heath:

It might be better to think of a corporation as the nexus of 4 separate entities: investors who provide capital, employees who do the work, suppliers who provide raw material, etc, and customers who purchase the products or services the corporation buys.

In different organizations the 'owners' are different: in co-ops its the suppliers, mutual insurance companies the customers, in employee-owned companies the employees, but in 90% of cases (including Monsanto) its the investors.

The investors who provided capital by buying shares of stock are the owners, and will be compensated. This frequently happens indirectly: you may own Monsanto stock through a mutual fund or other such aggregate which means that your mutual fund will get the money. Whether that winds up being a profit or loss is more complicated.