Timeline for 2014 Traditional IRA Contribution that was not Deducted
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
10 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 17, 2016 at 1:36 | vote | accept | Geo | ||
| Mar 10, 2016 at 19:50 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/StackFinance/status/708017232073400321 | ||
| Mar 10, 2016 at 18:03 | comment | added | Joe | @user102008 Good point - since the IRS considers all IRAs to be one IRA. | |
| Mar 10, 2016 at 18:01 | answer | added | Joe | timeline score: 6 | |
| Mar 10, 2016 at 18:01 | comment | added | littleadv | It doesn't matter if it is the same custodian or not. "Intermingled" means you have deductible contributions and non-deductible contributions. Whether they are at the same custodian or not doesn't matter. | |
| Mar 10, 2016 at 18:00 | answer | added | littleadv | timeline score: 2 | |
| Mar 10, 2016 at 17:38 | history | edited | Geo | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 4 characters in body
|
| Mar 10, 2016 at 16:52 | comment | added | Geo | I believe is intermingled since I just used the same custodian I normally use. @Joe | |
| Mar 10, 2016 at 16:25 | comment | added | Joe | Is this $5,500 the only money in that traditional IRA, or is it intermingled with other funds that were deducted? | |
| Mar 10, 2016 at 16:13 | history | asked | Geo | CC BY-SA 3.0 |