Timeline for How to evaluate growth stocks
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
6 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Jul 6, 2015 at 15:23 | answer | added | Tom Sun | timeline score: 1 | |
Mar 7, 2015 at 6:08 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/#!/StackFinance/status/574089280320045056 | ||
Mar 5, 2015 at 12:57 | comment | added | Daniel | I don't expect many growth stocks to be as stable as value stocks. In fact I think it will be rare that you find a growth stock that is as stable as a value stock. | |
Mar 5, 2015 at 10:25 | comment | added | rbrtl | If these stocks you're looking at have not been trading 10 years, what are your criteria for a 'stable stock'? One could suggest that stable stocks have been trading for more than 20-30 years, with stable performance over the entire period. Stocks active for less than 10 years might still be benefiting from being new and exciting. | |
Mar 5, 2015 at 4:35 | review | First posts | |||
Mar 5, 2015 at 12:26 | |||||
Mar 5, 2015 at 4:33 | history | asked | Daniel | CC BY-SA 3.0 |