Skip to main content
added 10 characters in body
Source Link
Chris Degnen
  • 10.1k
  • 1
  • 21
  • 36

If the savings rate is the same as the loan rate, mathematically it doesn't make any difference whether you pay down the loan more and save less or vice versa.

However, if the loan rate is higher than the savings rate it's better to pay it down as fast as possible.

The chart below compares paying down the loan and saving equally (the gradual scenario), versus paying down the loan quickly at 2 x $193 and then saving 2 x $193. The savings rate, for illustration, is 2%.

Paying quickly pays down the loan downcompletely by month 51. On the other hand, in the gradual scheme thethe loan can't be paid down (with the savings) until month 54, which then leaves 3 months less for saving. In conclusion, it's better to pay down the higher rate loan first. Practically speaking, it may be useful to have some savings available.

enter image description here

If the savings rate is the same as the loan rate, mathematically it doesn't make any difference whether you pay down the loan more and save less or vice versa.

However, if the loan rate is higher than the savings rate it's better to pay it down as fast as possible.

The chart below compares paying down the loan and saving equally (the gradual scenario), versus paying down the loan quickly at 2 x $193 and then saving 2 x $193. The savings rate, for illustration, is 2%.

Paying quickly pays the loan down by month 51. On the other hand, in the gradual scheme the loan can't be paid down (with the savings) until month 54, which then leaves 3 months less for saving. In conclusion, it's better to pay down the higher rate loan first. Practically speaking, it may be useful to have some savings available.

enter image description here

If the savings rate is the same as the loan rate, mathematically it doesn't make any difference whether you pay down the loan more and save less or vice versa.

However, if the loan rate is higher than the savings rate it's better to pay it down as fast as possible.

The chart below compares paying down the loan and saving equally (the gradual scenario), versus paying down the loan quickly at 2 x $193 and then saving 2 x $193. The savings rate, for illustration, is 2%.

Paying quickly pays down the loan completely by month 51. On the other hand, in the gradual scheme the loan can't be paid down (with the savings) until month 54, which then leaves 3 months less for saving. In conclusion, it's better to pay down the higher rate loan first. Practically speaking, it may be useful to have some savings available.

enter image description here

added 96 characters in body
Source Link
Chris Degnen
  • 10.1k
  • 1
  • 21
  • 36

If the savings rate is the same as the loan rate, mathematically it doesn't make any difference whether you pay down the loan more and save less or vice versa.

However, if the loan rate is higher than the savings rate it's better to pay it down as fast as possible.

The chart below compares paying down the loan and saving equally (the gradual scenario), versus paying down the loan quickly at 2 x $193 and then saving 2 x $193. The savings rate, for illustration, is 2%.

Paying quickly pays the loan down by month 51. On the other hand, in the gradual scheme the loan can't be paid down (with the savings) until month 54, which then leaves 3 months less for saving. It's always In conclusion, it's better to pay down the higher rate loan first. (Of course, practically Practically speaking, it's a good ideait may be useful to have some savings available just in case.)

enter image description here

If the savings rate is the same as the loan rate, mathematically it doesn't make any difference whether you pay down the loan more and save less or vice versa.

However, if the loan rate is higher than the savings rate it's better to pay it down as fast as possible.

The chart below compares paying down the loan and saving equally (the gradual scenario), versus paying down the loan quickly at 2 x $193 and then saving 2 x $193. The savings rate, for illustration, is 2%.

Paying quickly pays the loan down by month 51. On the other hand, in gradual scheme the loan can't be paid down (with the savings) until month 54, which then leaves 3 months less for saving. It's always better to pay down the higher rate loan first. (Of course, practically speaking, it's a good idea to have some savings available just in case.)

enter image description here

If the savings rate is the same as the loan rate, mathematically it doesn't make any difference whether you pay down the loan more and save less or vice versa.

However, if the loan rate is higher than the savings rate it's better to pay it down as fast as possible.

The chart below compares paying down the loan and saving equally (the gradual scenario), versus paying down the loan quickly at 2 x $193 and then saving 2 x $193. The savings rate, for illustration, is 2%.

Paying quickly pays the loan down by month 51. On the other hand, in the gradual scheme the loan can't be paid down (with the savings) until month 54, which then leaves 3 months less for saving. In conclusion, it's better to pay down the higher rate loan first. Practically speaking, it may be useful to have some savings available.

enter image description here

added 96 characters in body
Source Link
Chris Degnen
  • 10.1k
  • 1
  • 21
  • 36

If the savings rate is the same as the loan rate, mathematically it doesn't make any difference whether you pay down the loan more and save less or vice versa.

However, if the loan rate is higher than the savings rate it's better to pay it down as fast as possible.

The chart below compares paying down the loan and saving equally (the gradual scenario), versus paying down the loan quickly at 2 x $193 and then saving 2 x $193. The savings rate, for illustration, is 2%.

Paying quickly pays the loan down by month 51. On the other hand, in gradual scheme the loan can't be paid down (with the savings) until month 54, which then leaves 3 months less for saving. It's always better to pay down the higher rate loan first. (Of course, practically speaking, it's a good idea to have some savings available just in case.)

enter image description here

If the savings rate is the same as the loan rate, mathematically it doesn't make any difference whether you pay down the loan more and save less or vice versa.

However, if the loan rate is higher than the savings rate it's better to pay it down as fast as possible.

The chart below compares paying down the loan and saving equally (the gradual scenario), versus paying down the loan quickly at 2 x $193 and then saving 2 x $193. The savings rate, for illustration, is 2%.

Paying quickly pays the loan down by month 51. On the other hand, in gradual scheme the loan can't be paid down (with the savings) until month 54, which then leaves 3 months less for saving. It's always better to pay down the higher rate loan first.

enter image description here

If the savings rate is the same as the loan rate, mathematically it doesn't make any difference whether you pay down the loan more and save less or vice versa.

However, if the loan rate is higher than the savings rate it's better to pay it down as fast as possible.

The chart below compares paying down the loan and saving equally (the gradual scenario), versus paying down the loan quickly at 2 x $193 and then saving 2 x $193. The savings rate, for illustration, is 2%.

Paying quickly pays the loan down by month 51. On the other hand, in gradual scheme the loan can't be paid down (with the savings) until month 54, which then leaves 3 months less for saving. It's always better to pay down the higher rate loan first. (Of course, practically speaking, it's a good idea to have some savings available just in case.)

enter image description here

Source Link
Chris Degnen
  • 10.1k
  • 1
  • 21
  • 36
Loading