Skip to main content
7 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Nov 25, 2013 at 21:59 comment added Matthew Flaschen Thanks, @ChrisW.Rea. I think that definitely covers a major aspect of it. In fact, opportunity risk may just be an extreme case of illiquidity risk (if the asset were fully liquid, you could switch to the better opportunity).
Nov 24, 2013 at 4:18 comment added Chris W. Rea If by "commitment" you mean locking in (as opposed to just a current choice) then I'd also suggest "illiquidity risk", i.e. can't get out of the poorer-performing investment to switch to the better one.
Nov 24, 2013 at 2:44 comment added Matthew Flaschen This is a good overall explanation. However, my question wasn't specific to this particular low-risk asset. I just chose that as a simple example. The question applies anytime you make a commitment to an investment (even if that happens to be a subprime mortgage bond), then find a better one later.
Nov 22, 2013 at 15:53 comment added JTP - Apologise to Monica Nice. The "Risk-free Rate" is always going to seem low compared to what one might hope for. By definition, higher returns require higher risk.
Nov 22, 2013 at 15:47 history edited Chris W. Rea CC BY-SA 3.0
added 6 characters in body
Nov 22, 2013 at 15:29 history edited Chris W. Rea CC BY-SA 3.0
added 8 characters in body
Nov 22, 2013 at 15:23 history answered Chris W. Rea CC BY-SA 3.0