Timeline for Is it a good investment strategy to go long on "boring" companies (AT&T for example) and keep them around just because of their dividends?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
10 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 2, 2019 at 3:10 | history | edited | Franck Dernoncourt | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
Making title more informative
|
| Nov 24, 2014 at 18:09 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/#!/StackFinance/status/536944723970519040 | ||
| Oct 24, 2014 at 19:51 | answer | added | FreshTendrils | timeline score: 0 | |
| Sep 22, 2012 at 15:49 | comment | added | Eric Fleischman | For what it's worth, if you decide to invest in high dividend stocks, there are a few indexes (and associated index tracking funds) that can help. VIG and VYM (ETFs managed by Vanguard) come to mind as good examples, as well as the indexes that they are based upon. | |
| Aug 11, 2010 at 20:05 | answer | added | lucius | timeline score: 4 | |
| Aug 10, 2010 at 19:13 | history | edited | Alex B |
edited tags
|
|
| Apr 29, 2010 at 15:48 | answer | added | user296 | timeline score: 3 | |
| Apr 24, 2010 at 12:17 | history | edited | Zephyr |
Retag
|
|
| Apr 23, 2010 at 16:32 | answer | added | sdg | timeline score: 6 | |
| Apr 23, 2010 at 14:50 | history | asked | user427 | CC BY-SA 2.5 |