Skip to main content
11 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Jan 15, 2020 at 22:06 history edited D Stanley CC BY-SA 4.0
deleted 41 characters in body
Jan 15, 2020 at 22:04 comment added D Stanley @RonJohn You and Bob are right I had it backwards. I have always thought of it as a commission on top of the investment. Honestly the result isn't that much different but I'll amend my answer.
Jan 15, 2020 at 21:57 comment added Bob Baerker You may have gotten RonJohn but you lost me. If they take out 4.5% as a front load charge, $955 of $1,000 is invested. From everything that I've have ever seen, the sales load comes off the top.
Jan 15, 2020 at 20:33 comment added RonJohn Right... understood.
Jan 15, 2020 at 20:31 comment added D Stanley @RonJohn The premise was that OP has $1,000 to invest. The 4.5% fee is added on to the actual invested amount, so $957 * 1.045 = 1,000. Normally you'd buy X of the fund and pay X*(1+fee), so the math in this case is inverted. Alternatively you could invest $1,000 and pay $1,045 for the shares.
Jan 15, 2020 at 20:28 comment added RonJohn Why $1000 / 1.045 instead of $1000 * (1 - 4.5%)?
Jan 15, 2020 at 20:26 history edited D Stanley CC BY-SA 4.0
added 42 characters in body
Jan 15, 2020 at 20:24 comment added D Stanley @RonJohn 1000 / 1.045 = 957 (OP uses a fee of 4.5% in the example).
Jan 15, 2020 at 20:22 comment added RonJohn Where does the $957 come from? $1000 * (1 - 5.75%) = $942.50.
Jan 15, 2020 at 20:20 history edited D Stanley CC BY-SA 4.0
added 227 characters in body
Jan 15, 2020 at 20:14 history answered D Stanley CC BY-SA 4.0