Skip to main content
3 events
when toggle format what by license comment
May 7, 2019 at 15:37 comment added MSalters @CarlWitthoft: Mathematically, you can do whatever you like. But I'm missing the intent of your proposal. It seems to heavily penalize people who have a variable income. In the years where they could afford to fund their 401K, you would forbid it, but you'd allow it.when they don't actually have the money.
May 7, 2019 at 14:24 comment added Carl Witthoft This is the real reason. There's no reason that the cap couldn't be indexed (in reverse) to income - for example, below 3X poverty line: no limit, above $500,000 annual, zero contribution allowed.
May 7, 2019 at 14:06 history answered KriyanshAurik CC BY-SA 4.0