Skip to main content
Tweeted twitter.com/StackFinance/status/1062495493945737217
Shortened title
Source Link
Grade 'Eh' Bacon
  • 43k
  • 11
  • 110
  • 164

What power/ownership rights would a person have if they owned greater than 50% exclusively with>50% of a corporation's non-voting preferred stocks with no voting rightsshares?

What power/ownership rights would a person have if they owned greater than 50% exclusively withof a corporation's preferred stocks, with no voting rights?

Would they own the company but have no say in it's direction? Are they liable for anything? I guess I'm curious if this has or can happen and what it would mean, functionally.

What power/ownership rights would a person have if they owned greater than 50% exclusively with preferred stocks with no voting rights?

What power/ownership rights would a person have if they owned greater than 50% exclusively with preferred stocks with no voting rights?

Would they own the company but have no say in it's direction? Are they liable for anything? I guess I'm curious if this has or can happen and what it would mean, functionally.

What power would a person have if they owned >50% of a corporation's non-voting preferred shares?

What power/ownership rights would a person have if they owned greater than 50% of a corporation's preferred stocks, with no voting rights?

Would they own the company but have no say in it's direction? Are they liable for anything? I guess I'm curious if this has or can happen and what it would mean, functionally.

Source Link
user44273
user44273

What power/ownership rights would a person have if they owned greater than 50% exclusively with preferred stocks with no voting rights?

What power/ownership rights would a person have if they owned greater than 50% exclusively with preferred stocks with no voting rights?

Would they own the company but have no say in it's direction? Are they liable for anything? I guess I'm curious if this has or can happen and what it would mean, functionally.