2

Suppose that I'm either an owner or part owner (through shares) of Example Corporation. One day I get a phone call from Warren Buffett. He says that Berkshire Hathaway is interested in buying ExampleCorp.

I'm no dummy and I know that past performance is not a guarantee of future performance, and Warren has made mistakes in the past, but it seems to me that an offer from him indicates that he thinks my company is

  • profitable
  • well-run
  • likely to stick around for the long term

For the purposes of this question, assume he's right and ExampleCorp is all of those things. In that case, why would any owner want to sell a profitable, well-run business that's likely to be around to give returns well into the foreseeable future? Or, to phrase the question another way, why is it rational for Warren Buffett to continue to make offers to purchase companies when an offer from him is an indication that the company would be just fine without him?

  • 6
    Why does anyone sell a company? Because the price was right. "A Record $2.5 Trillion in Mergers Were Announced in the First Half of 2018" nytimes.com/2018/07/03/business/dealbook/… – Bob Baerker Aug 19 '18 at 13:04
  • Because he wants to pay you twenty years of returns right now? – user253751 Sep 17 at 11:21
  • The board of directors and 51% of the voting shares agree to the terms, so you as a retail investor are committed too. – user662852 Sep 17 at 11:51
11

Let's say you are offered ten million dollars.

You have the choice between taking ten million dollars, and spend the rest of your life on some lovely beach.

Or you can keep working hard until your company is worth twenty million dollars. You could still go to a lovely beach, but you missed many years of beach life, and you are now old and exhausted.

Which one do you choose?

(I know a young man who lives in Malta now with his lovely wife, and who has about £60 million to spend. He's a lovely guy, quite normal except that he has lot of cash. Why would he go on working? )

| improve this answer | |
  • 2
    Because he enjoys it? Personally, I can handle a week (maybe two if there's good surfing or snorkling), laying around on a beach before the boredom gets to me. – jamesqf Aug 19 '18 at 17:10
  • Down vote. When BH purchased a privately owned business, they did so leaving existing management in place. No time to rest on the beach. – Pete B. Aug 20 '18 at 10:45
  • 1
    Even if you enjoy working, you might want to work on something else. The excitement for you may have been starting a new company from scratch. Once it is (mostly) stable, you sell out (no negative connotation intended) to someone else to manage, and move on to a new idea. – chepner Sep 17 at 12:28
  • Existing management usually does not have to commit to staying indefinitely. Six months to a year seems a common period before checking out. – chepner Sep 17 at 12:29
9

You are assuming too many things.

Quite a few well run companies due to various factors are in liquidity crisis. If not resolved, they would go bankrupt. So they approach Warren and quite a few Private equity firms. A deal is made.

Most of Warren investment are also through regular purchase on stock market via block deals.

In the example you have quoted, if the company doesn't need additional capital, it will not sell. If it needs additional capital it will consider the offer.

| improve this answer | |
  • 3
    Or, they may not be in crisis, and about to go bankrupt, but – although they've got a good model/market and are well run – they aren't going to become "big time" without a significant injection of cash. Buffet / private equity is one source of such capital. – TripeHound Aug 20 '18 at 7:14
  • @TripeHound Agree. I implied it in last paragraph. Thanks for putting it explicit – Dheer Aug 20 '18 at 16:35
4

There could be 101 different reasons why someone would sell out their company. Some examples I have heard Buffett say over the years include:

  1. It is a private family owned company, and the company doesn't have anyone in the family who wants/ is willing to take over once the current leader passes away. So they sell it, take the profit, invest in something passive for the family. Instead of selling out to their competitor.

  2. Being a C level executive of a publicly traded company is a giant pain. You have to spend a lot of time justifying everything you do, raising capital, watching what you say etc. When you get bought out by Berkshire, Warren tends to be easier to deal with then a lot public investors. Warren is also notorious for staying out of your hair until he sees something that he doesn't like. You have more time to focus on the business, even if you own less of the company.

  3. The company could be a gold mine, but has some bad management, and is undervalued because of the management. Buffett sees that and puts someone more competent in charge, the stock goes up he sells.

  4. He liked the company so much he decided to buy it, and put you back in charge to run the company with a good compensation that takes away your exposure to the market. Good stable pay can be valuable to.

  5. You bought the company when it was doing badly, you turned it around, the stock is much higher, and you have a large equity position, but no longer want to be in charge of the company. You want to move onto the next bad company so you can turn it for a profit. You find a suitable replacement, and sell out your position in the company to someone like Warren. You get your payday, he gets a good company.

I am sure there are more, some of them have been mentioned in this thread.

| improve this answer | |
3

Another reason someone might sell out: They are equity-rich but cash-poor. If they're running their company well, Warren Buffett isn't going to mess with that — they keep their de-facto position but get a pile of cash.

| improve this answer | |
0

Suppose that I'm either an owner or part owner (through shares) of Example Corporation.

why would any owner want to sell a profitable, well-run business that's likely to be around to give returns well into the foreseeable future?

A modified version of gnasher729's answer: because, after 30 years of 70 hour weeks, the owner wants to relax. He couldn't watch his children grow up; maybe he'll see his grandchildren grow up.

Or... he's getting divorced and doesn't want his wife to have access to it. Better to sell the company and give her cash.

| improve this answer | |
0

RISK. BH is taking on risk, and alleviating risk to you, as owner. Risk comes with a cost. On the buy sell, one will offer less if the risk is high. On the sell side, one will accept less if the risk is high.

Each other's risk assessment, AND risk value will be different. Longer the time horizon results in exponential increase in risk.

| improve this answer | |
0

Because Warren Buffett knows something you don't know. Also you may be a dummy and call from him is not an indication of how well your company is doing.

As an owner you can estimate answers to this questions:

  • How much money I can earn in the next 10-20 years
  • How much money I can loose in the next 10-20 years

and Buffett can either:

  • make more money than you think you are able to earn. Simply because you don't have R&D funds and/or development money
  • Loose more money than you think your company is able to. Because, believe it or not, people are buying companies to lose money on them because then they can deduct more money on "loss" side and therefore earn more money by paying lower tax (in general simplification).

And most important: People don't like waiting for gratification. You gonna earn 10 millions during those 10 years? Buffett is giving you 5 millions on the spot. No waiting. Not in five years. Right here. An individual looks different on theirs personal income than people who calculate income in matters of years if not decades.

You think you can spend one million on drugs and hookers and then live forever on interest form remaining 4. Because that what YOU personally need.
Buffett have those "comfy money" for years. And I cannot say why multimillionaires want to have more millions.

| improve this answer | |
  • 2
    people are buying companies to lose money on them because then they can deduct more money on "loss" side and therefore earn more money by paying lower tax I'd like to see any justification for this. A $100 loss is a $100 loss and can offset taxes but not at 100%. ie) you get 25% of that back but not $100. – Chris Aug 20 '18 at 18:52
  • Imagine you earn enough money to go into highest tax. For example 45% from 151,000. So you lower your income by 2000 (by giving to charity) and you fall to 40% tax. You spend 2000 but you SAVED 8350. Companies by investments can avoid extra taxes, avoid paying dividend to shareholders (so they have very large income but show no profit). – SZCZERZO KŁY Aug 21 '18 at 7:48
  • 2
    The tax bracket is a marginal tax bracket, if you jump down a bracket only the portion of the $2000 that is below the bracket will be taxed less. See this link for more info investopedia.com/ask/answers/071114/… – Chris Aug 22 '18 at 1:25

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.