21

This question is about personal finance as this directly applies to my situation as a US citizen, which I intend to keep for work purposes, and as a citizen of another country, which I am willing to switch if it is tax advantageous. See Why was this question put on hold as off-topic?.

Assume that Bob is a citizen of the US and a citizen of country X. Bob lives in country X. Since the US uses citizenship-based taxation, Bob is subject to taxes in both the US and country X. Is there any country X that fully exempts their citizens/residents from the US citizenship-based taxation?

I read on 20minutes.fr (mirror) that some French politicians are trying to pass a law exempting dual US+French citizens living in France from US taxes:

« Le problème principal, c’est que la fiscalité américaine est basée sur la nationalité, en contradiction avec les règles de l’OCDE, estime l’eurodéputée française Virginie Rozière. L’Erythrée a voulu faire pareil et a été sanctionnée. Il n’y a pas de raisons de traiter les États-Unis différemment. Ils ne se comportent plus comme un grand frère bienveillant mais comme un acteur sans foi ni loi qui cherche le rapport de force. Si on n’est pas capable de répondre, on se fera écraser ».

Translation (based on Google Translate):

"The main problem is that the US tax is based on nationality, in contradiction with OECD rules," said French MEP Virginie Rozière. "Eritrea wanted to do the same and was sanctioned. There is no reason to treat the United States differently. They no longer behave like a benevolent big brother, but as a faithless, lawless actor who pursues relations based on force. If we cannot respond, we will be crushed."

so I wonder if any precedent exists.

Improve this question
10
60

As that taxation law is an US law, no other country can declare an 'exemption' to it.

If France for example would 'allow' their citizens to ignore it, the US IRS would still consider the taxes due and would act accordingly - up to impounding assets located in the US and arresting the person on the next visit. This would also probably imply that many visas from third countries would become harder or impossible to get, as they look at US 'pending arrests'. France in this example could do nothing to address these consequences directly.

Basically, there is no difference between being a US citizen & hiding abroad & not paying taxes and being a dual citizen & living abroad.

If someone doesn't like the consequences of being a US citizen, he/she can rescind the citizenship (and be rid of the tax issue) or, of course, vote for a representative who will change those laws.

Don't get me wrong - I agree that that tax law is not good as is. There is just nothing another country can effectively do to end it.

Improve this answer
12
  • 2
    Thanks. 1) couldn't a tax treaty establish such an exemption? 2) from the quote in the question "Eritrea wanted to do the same and was punished". -> I would be curious to know more about it but somehow it sounds like some kind of solution was found for the case of Eritrea.
    – Franck Dernoncourt
    Jul 4 '18 at 19:15
  • 31
    1) sure - but that needs the agreement of the US. They do have such treaties with many countries; typically, all tax you already paid in the other country will reduce your taxes for the US. If you live in a country with higher federal tax, you just have to file in the US, but never pay a cent.
    – Aganju
    Jul 4 '18 at 19:21
  • 1
    That's new to me, but I'm not up to date. It worked for 2017, though.
    – Aganju
    Jul 5 '18 at 2:41
  • 4
    @Sean: you may be thinking of the TCJA change that starting this year caps the (itemized) deduction for state and local taxes (on income or sales and property, abbreviated SALT) to $10k. TCJA also increases the standard deduction so fewer people will benefit from itemizing at all. This is different from the credit for foreign country taxes on income only.
    – dave_thompson_085
    Jul 5 '18 at 3:15
  • 1
    @Aganju: good points (cf. Foreign Tax Credit and Foreign Earned Income Exlusion). Note, however, that filing alone can be extremely expensive for nonresidents - good luck finding someone expert in US taxes if you are retired in Honduras but have assets in Europe and Japan.
    – Stephan Kolassa
    Jul 5 '18 at 7:42
12

Although no other country can change the IRS’s mind that a U.S. citizen living abroad owes it taxes, good luck to them collecting from you in certain parts of the world. (Not that I’d ever give advice on how to evade taxes.)

More seriously, the United States has signed reciprocal tax treaties with many different countries in which they agree that some citizens or residents of other countries owe the IRS fewer taxes. See IRS Publication 901, “U.S. Tax Treaties.”

However:

Tax treaties reduce the U.S. taxes of residents of foreign countries. With certain exceptions, they do not reduce the U.S. taxes of U.S. citizens or residents. U.S. citizens and residents are subject to U.S. income tax on their worldwide income.

You can see which exceptions exist in IRS Publication 901, but you should consult with a tax lawyer if you have any questions. No country has negotiated a blanket exemption for all U.S. expatriates.

In many cases, payments from a foreign government (or its political subdivisions) for services rendered are exempt from U.S. income tax unless the services are performed in the United States by a U.S. resident. However, U.S. citizens who accept positions from a foreign government should make sure that the State Department understands that they do not intend to relinquish their U.S. citizenship.

Improve this answer
11
  • Thanks for the pointer to the Publication 901! Also I wasn't aware of the possibility of losing one's citizenship if one accepts certain “policy-level” jobs from a foreign government, this is good to know.
    – Franck Dernoncourt
    Jul 5 '18 at 5:54
  • @FranckDernoncourt the "policy level" distinction is relevant to the presumption of intent; there are many potentially expatriating acts defined by statute where the US has a presumption that the act was undertaken without an intent to lose US citizenship, in which case the act does not cause expatriation. Certain acts do not fall under that presumption, but the person can still seek to establish a lack of intent to lose US citizenship (for example, by stating formally "I didn't intend to lose US citizenship"). It's possible to lose US citizenship, but generally not involuntarily.
    – phoog
    Jul 5 '18 at 15:33
  • @phoog There’s more detail at the link I cited, but it does say that, for example, becoming another country’s foreign minister is generally incompatible with retaining citizenship. But not talking to the State Department about it ahead of time makes you subject to a judgment call. Also (without getting into politics) the USCIS is starting a new Denaturalization Task Force in July 2018 that might interpret the law more punitively. So, my main point is that an expat should be aware of the possibility and get advice appropriate to his or her situation.
    – Davislor
    Jul 5 '18 at 16:25
  • 1
    Speaking of foreign ministers, Boris Johnson was listed in the Federal Register with those whose loss of US nationality was reported to the Treasury department during the last quarter of 2016. That was not long after he became foreign minister. I do not know whether the loss of citizenship resulted from his taking the position (8 USC 1481(a)(4)) or from a formal renunciation (8 USC 1481(a)(5) or (a)(6)). He had been talking for years about giving up his US citizenship, so either is plausible.
    – phoog
    Jul 5 '18 at 16:42
  • 3
    @Davislor It's fine to link to the policy but you really should clarify the point in your answer: it's not actually a common problem that expats become the head of state or foreign minister of another country. Those are the only jobs listed where the State Dept. won't presume an intent to continue with American citizenship and one would have to assume that, if a US citizen were about to become the head of a foreign power, the State Dept would be even more anxious to talk to that person about its ramifications.
    – lly
    Jul 5 '18 at 17:41

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.