5

I read a few articles and posts about putting some money aside for retirement, but it was mostly for America/Canada where if I understand it right, you have to actively save your money in 401K/RRSP.

In France I am automatically deducted from my paycheck a certain amount by the government, and after working 42years I will touch a pension, which will be calculated as a percentage of my earnings during my career.

Also, if my readings are correct, if I put aside 25 times my annual spending, I should be able to retrieve 4% of the interest annually and be safe with my money. [link]

My question is how can I evaluate the value of the government pension? Say the pension is 25K€ per year, can I consider it to be equal to having 625K€ put aside, earning interests or does the math is different?

3

That's how the math works, mostly.

The 4% rule (not 4% of the interest, but an assumed 4% withdrawal based on first year value of a portfolio), suggests that $1M in assets would permit a $40K/yr withdrawal. When anyone analyses their retirement goal, it's typical to look at Social security or other pension money as part of the math.

Not needing to withdraw $40K from a retirement account multiplies up to a $1M balance that one doesn't need to save.

To be clear, a couple looks as earnings and spending, and decides $80K is their desired yearly number. Since their Social Security adds to $40k/yr, they only need to save to withdraw $40K from savings, and that multiplies to $1M needed.

The difference, if any, is that (a) the pension/SS will not flow to a beneficiary, it stops after the death of the worker (or spouse in some circumstances). And (b) the flow of cash is fixed. If I have an emergency, I can always withdraw a bit more in one year, and adjust withdrawals accordingly. No such flexibility with a pension.

  • Thank you for answering. Could you clarify not 4% of the interest, but an assumed 4% withdrawal based on first year value of a portfolio ? I I don't understand the difference between the two. – Julien Rousé May 1 '18 at 15:33
  • 1
    A retirement account worth $1M might have no interest or dividends at all, it may be invested in stocks whose return is all capital gains. The US S&P tends to return 10% per year, with only about 2% as dividends, 7-8% is growth, some of which is eaten by inflation. My objection to the word “interest” may be nit-picky, or a crucial distinction for investors. Depends how precise you’d like to be. – JoeTaxpayer May 1 '18 at 16:10
  • Thanks for taking the time to explain that, I was not aware that no dividends was possible, I need to educate myself a lot more on this topic. – Julien Rousé May 1 '18 at 19:36
  • 1
    I know you are not in the US, but we have a famous Stock, Berkshire Hathaway, that was introduced in the early 1960s and is now worth well over $100,000, and they have never given out a dividend. If you own the stock and tried to take money from it you would simply have to sell a share each year. If you invest in a mutual fund, each year you might get distributions from dividends and distributed capital gains, and that might be enough cash to meet your 4% goal. Otherwise similarly you would be selling some shares each year. – JoeTaxpayer May 1 '18 at 19:48

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.