This seems like a "too good to be true" tax dodge in the USA milieu.

Is it correct?

  • Sally is a graphic designer married with a typical family. She gets $100,000 in 2017 as 1099 income.

  • She buys a Graphics Monitor in 2017 for $1000. We'll say, it is genuinely and absolutely a true and honest deductible expense for her work/clients. (She bought it for "a particular job" so the entire amount is deductible at once.)

  • She files her taxes. She gets the "standard deduction" of $12,700. So it's completely pointless itemizing deductions.

  • In short she gets $12,700 deductions.

She goes back in time and tries this:

  • She has an S-Corp (or LLC as an S-Corp). It is paid the $100,000 in 2017.

  • The monitor is a deduction, a cost, for the S-Corp. Which thus profits $99,000 in 2017.

  • Sally gets $99,000 income, and takes the standard deduction of $12,700.

  • In short she gets $13,700 "deductions".

This appears to be an absolutely correct way to save 1000- in taxable income.

Any deductions (more precisely: "costs") totaling under 12700 in situation "A" are totally wasted; in situation "B" you get them.

It seems too good to be true - am I correct?

Just a clarification for any future googlers, in fact I am not correct. IE, there is no advantage, you "get" the $1000 either way. HartCO explains it below!

  • 1
    Business expenses (deductions) offset business income, nothing to do with itemized deductions.
    – Hart CO
    Mar 27, 2018 at 21:26
  • OK - so in "A", Sally can NOT in any way take advantage of the $1000 - is that correct? Teach me
    – Fattie
    Mar 27, 2018 at 21:28
  • 2
    I think what Hart means is that business expenses are deducted separately from personal expenses, so one can deduct business expenses and take the full standard deduction.
    – D Stanley
    Mar 27, 2018 at 22:39

2 Answers 2


Business expenses (deductions) offset business income, so no matter which type of pass-through business entity she is using (Sole proprietorship,LLC,S-Corp,Partnership), the expenses will offset her business revenue. She's taxed on the profit from her business, not the revenue.

In both cases, she only has $99,000 in business income reported in the income section of the 1040, and nothing further down on her tax return changes that. The only tax-disadvantage she faces filing as a sole-proprietor (example 1) is that she might pay more self-employment tax than if she has an S-Corp.

  • Wait - in the first example, Sally's not using any sort of business entity - right?
    – Fattie
    Mar 27, 2018 at 23:07
  • I get it: even if you just file individually with no "corp" aspect at all - you still "first" calculate any business costs. OK! So in short my example was completely wrong, that's the answer. Awesome!!!
    – Fattie
    Mar 27, 2018 at 23:48
  • 1
    @Fattie Yeah the default is 'sole-proprietorship' if you have 1099 income.
    – Hart CO
    Mar 28, 2018 at 0:07

It goes on Schedule C, which is business profit/loss, and has no impact on itemized deductions.

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.