I just opened my 401(k) at the beginning of 2017. In 2017 it did great because of the bull market, but since 2018 I've lost about $1,000. All of my contributions this year have been a complete waste.

I feel like a lot of that could have been avoided if I had put some kind of "hold" on the 401(k) during the weeks where the stock market performed really badly. Sure it wouldn't have grown either, but at least I wouldn't have lost so much.

All of my 401(k) investments are funds with the lowest cost (0.31%)

Is there any way I can protect my 401(k) during times like this or is this something I'll just have to get used to and trust that over time it'll correct itself?

  • 63
    Get used to it. The stock market will go up and down, and it all sorts itself out in the long run. It's only when you are approaching retirement that it may be worth trading potential gain for more security.
    – Simon B
    Mar 26, 2018 at 22:18
  • 57
    Just take solace in the knowledge that when the market is down, you're buying shares on the cheap.
    – shoover
    Mar 26, 2018 at 23:29
  • 31
    "All of my contributions this year have been a complete waste." Re-read Shoover's sage comment.
    – Beanluc
    Mar 26, 2018 at 23:48
  • 13
    The premise of your question is that you could apply your "hold" at the moment that the market started to decline, and stop applying it when it starts going up again. Do you imagine that there is a bell which is rung when the market hits a peak, and is rung again when it hits a trough? If not, how would you know when to apply your hold? By the assumption of the scenario, the hold must be applied precisely when the market appears to be doing very well. If you have an unmistakable sign for when the market looks good but is really about to decline, please share it! Mar 27, 2018 at 18:03
  • 3
    I'm definitely the heretical fish out of water here since I believe that protecting your ASSet is as important as investing. If you're older with a decent sized portfolio, experiencing 50+ draw downs as in 2000 and 2008 is financial malpractice. Having a million dollar portfolio drop to under $500k would not lead me to revel over the opportunity to DCA and buy shares on the cheap. Mar 27, 2018 at 22:25

10 Answers 10


This is a problem that always looks worse than it is. Here's why.

When you're young, and your 401k is weighted towards long-term growth, you're going to have large swings. That's expected, and you should never worry about it. Why? Because you're not selling now, you're selling years in the future. You don't realistically care what the stocks at any given moment, because it's kinda irrelevant when it comes to your actual retirement. What does matter is that the long-term growth is there, that you can expect decent percentage growth on average over a long period of time.

And when you're older, nearing retirement? Your 401k should be weighted towards lower-risk, more stable investments (such as Bonds.) At that point, market swings really don't matter all that much to you either, because your retirement fund is no longer heavily influenced by them.

  • 19
    I appreciate all of the answers, but your quote "you're not selling now, you're selling years in the future" was the most helpful to me and I just want to spread some of the reputation wealth around :) Mar 27, 2018 at 18:16
  • 23
    I actually kind of like when stocks in my 401k take a little dive (within reason). It means I can buy more for the same amount of money. When the price rebounds later, I'll just have more to sell when the time comes. At least that's what I tell myself. It helps me to think of my 401k, not as money, but as boxes of physical things that I'm buying now, to sell later when they will hopefully be worth more. Price drops are just the boxes going on a discount sale, it doesn't really affect what i already own. Mar 27, 2018 at 19:33
  • 3
    In addition, dollar-cost averaging during your early years means the wide swings actually work in your favor: you're buying more shares when the price is low, less shares when the price is high. Mar 27, 2018 at 22:02
  • @BradleyUffner Your comment brings up an important point - everybody who wants to buy wants prices to go down enough that they get a bargain, but not so far that the financial system is in jeopardy...
    – user12515
    Mar 28, 2018 at 18:37

In 1987, this is what we lived thru -

enter image description here

A high of 2722 and subsequent drop to 1739. Just over 36% in a few months. My 401(k) was just over $20K at that time, and I 'lost' $7000 between those 2 dates.

I recall thinking to myself, that if I were older, and passed the $1M mark, the drop would have been $360K, fully invested.

Fast forward to the crash of 2008-2009. On the way down from 1500 on the S&P, a friend tells me he went to cash at 1000. At 666, the bottom, he felt pretty smug. But just over a year later, as the market recovered past 1200, he was still out. And earning close to nothing in CDs. To time the market, you need to be right twice, the friend got out, not great timing, but never got back in.

I didn't sell at 1500, nor did I buy in at 666, save for the regular deposits, so for nearly a year, all buys were below 1000.

For most of my life I was fully in, 100% invested, no 80/20, 75/25 mix. After we retired in 2012, and the market rose 32% in 2013, I took that as a sign, and shifted to the mix that sane people should have, about 25% cash, or enough to ride out a reasonable crash. As time goes on, the +/- $1K swings won't bother you. A $10K swing in a day won't even make you blink.

  • 37
    I'd also like to point out, this is an excellent reason to use graphs that start at 0. That graph is designed to make the drop look WAY scarier than it is!
    – Ethan
    Mar 27, 2018 at 16:51
  • For this particular case, your graph could start at 40.94 and still be fair.
    – CactusCake
    Mar 27, 2018 at 17:37
  • 2
    @Ethan - you would enjoy the book "How to Lie With Statistics." It discusses your objection in very great detail. I agree with you. Really. Unfortunately, the easy graphs to access don't let the user choose the scaling. As a result, I've learned to view these as % YTD. More like "In '87, the Dow opened at 1900 or so, rose almost 50%, crashed by that 36%, then recovered, flat for the year. If I edited the right axis to reflect % gain/loss, it would be less of a scam. That all aside, my text is a thoughtful reflection to my younger days. Modems were 300 BAUD back then. Mar 27, 2018 at 17:52
  • 1
    So I need to think of in terms of the quantity of stock I own, not the current $ value. As long as I continue making contributions, then the total quantity will keep growing so someday that $ value will go up. Mar 27, 2018 at 18:04
  • 1
    @stannius the first published value of the DJIA.
    – CactusCake
    Mar 27, 2018 at 23:20

What you are talking about is an idea called "Timing the market". A lot of other people with more time, focus, and education than you or I have attempted to time the market in the past and failed. You are more likely to get in too late, or get too edgy and jump out early, than to consistently navigate the market ahead of millions of other people (all of whom are attempting to do the same thing, and beat you in the process).

Yes, it can be disconcerting to watch the market fluctuate, but you have years ahead of you working in your favor. Depending on your age there have likely been three or more significant recessions within your lifetime, so getting used to riding out the rough times and seeing the long term picture will both benefit you in the long run.

One concept you might want to read up on is "Dollar cost averaging", which boils down to the idea that during recessions you can buy many more shares for the same (discounted) price, and make long-term gains while other people are making short-term losses.


If you have a long time before retirement you don't try and protect losses. You cannot time the market. And in the long run the stock market always goes up. So when it is down you are getting a better value. During your lifetime you will see numerous large drops in the market. What's important when that happens is that you don't panic sell. It is almost a guarantee that you will end up selling at the bottom. I know plenty of people that did that in 2009 and lost half their retirement money. Those that didn't sell made all their money back and more.

The only thing you could try is to keep some money in cash or a very short term bond fund if available in your 401k. And during the next big downturn put that cash to work. The problem with that is it takes courage to buy when the market is down big.

If the stock market crashes beyond repair the money you lost will be the least of your worries.

  • 2
    Two of my former colleagues did opposite to the panic sell in. They bought "healthy" shares that had significantly dropped and made a fortune as they restored.
    – Crowley
    Mar 27, 2018 at 15:41
  • 3
    @Crowley you can only do that if you have "dry powder." But dry powder by definition is not invested, so, keeping dry powder is once again market timing. (At least you only have to be right once?)
    – stannius
    Mar 27, 2018 at 23:02
  • A difficult but important for the long term investor to do is to add more money to the market when he feels the worst about it. For most, that goes against every emotion experienced during a bear market. Mar 28, 2018 at 12:32
  • 2
    @stannius dry powder, or you have a job which provides a stream of cash to be invested. Looking for some "healthy" shares when you've cash to invest isn't market timing -- it's good practice and common sense. Alternately you can invest purely in indexes, which is just counting on everyone else to do that research for you.
    – Phil Frost
    Mar 28, 2018 at 13:39
  • @PhilFrost but the problem is that you want to not have already invested that cash.
    – user253751
    Mar 29, 2018 at 4:24

Think of it this way. The stocks you're investing in have just gone on sale. When things go on sale, people usually buy more of them rather than selling.

If you don't intend on selling them soon (next 5 to 10 years), then this is great! My retirement date is further than 10 years out, so if the stock market crashed tomorrow (and the companies I was invested in remained healthy), then I would be super happy because I have a chance to buy the stocks cheaply. It's highly likely that they will greatly increase in value before I retire.

If you're investing in mutual funds that cover a large part of the market, and your retirement date is far away, short-term market drops are a good thing. My IRA lost over 50% of its value in 2008 and stocks became cheap indeed. The value of my IRA is now far, far higher than it was before the stock market dropped in value. If I had sold then (which a lot of people did), I would have missed out on the subsequent gains.

So think long-term, not short-term. The stock market has its ups and downs. I personally only check the balance of my 401k about once a year, make sure my investments are balanced, and ignore it the rest of the time. There's no point in checking it more often when my retirement date is so far away.

If you are 5 - 10 years from retirement, I would suggest protecting money you'll need in the first few years of retirement by putting it in bonds. That will protect it from short-term market drops, but you won't get much return from it either. Keep the rest of the money in stocks because that money won't be needed short-term.

Since I suspect you are far from retirement, my advice is to make sure you're money is in low-cost funds, contribute as much as you can, and don't worry about the month to month balance.

  • 1
    I do get weekly texts with balance updates and that is probably just making me more anxious :) Mar 27, 2018 at 18:01
  • 4
    Oh wow, that would really contribute to anxiety. I would advise getting rid of those texts. Otherwise, you're going to be on quite the anxiety roller coaster Mar 27, 2018 at 18:47

There are already good answers here, so I won't get in to too much depth. You really can't understate how time is the method that protects your 401k. People generally think of their account as a total pot of money with periodic deposits. To your point, sometimes you make your contribution but your account value is down $1,000 (more than your contribution) so that whole contribution was just gobbled up in to the abyss. To illustrate time, this is a chart of $100 deposits in to VOO starting 3/1/2005. The standout lines are:

  • Orange - Your very first $100 (green got lost in the blue)

  • Yellow - A deposit that went in and immediately lost value

  • Red - Your most valuable $100.

enter image description here

Full Resolution Chart

It doesn't really matter what the security is, the point is that the most valuable $100 is the $100 you put in at the bottom by complete coincidence because you simply bought $100 every first of the month. The $100 that you put in but was gobbled up by the losses you incurred for the three months following the purchase is worth nearly 2.5x more nearly 10 years later. Your very first deposit is worth 2x more.

If you think of your account as a big stack of various $100 deposits it's a lot easier to simply ignore the fluctuations. Some of those $100s are $80 and some of them are $150. Over time the market has expanded, you buy your big basket of diversified companies and have faith that the market will expand in the next 30 years.

I used adjusted close of VOO. I was too deep in to the formatting when it dawned on me that adjusted close for the whole dataset would improperly adjust the future purchases, each purchase should have its own dividend adjustment path but the point remains. The math is $100 times monthly percent change between adjusted close values so the actual charted difference would be minimal.

  • "The $100 that you put in but was gobbled up by the losses you incurred for the three months following the purchase is worth nearly 2.5x more nearly 10 years later." That is really comforting! Wish you had answered earlier, your answer deserves more votes :) Mar 28, 2018 at 20:16
  • 1
    @401k-newbie, I just have a thing for charts. But you can see the effect that time has on your pile of $100 deposits. And further you can see why it makes sense to adjust your allocations as time goes on because your later deposits don't have that time effect.
    – quid
    Mar 28, 2018 at 20:19

As others have noted, timing the market is very hard.

Sure, if you could buy when the market is at its lowest, and sell when it's at its peak, then buy it all back when it's down again, etc, you could make a fortune. The problem is, how do you know when the market is at its high and low points?

There was another question on here where someone asked about comparing the performance of his investments with the best he could possibly have done. I did a little research and I forget the exact numbers for the time period he gave, but yesterday (as I write this) USG went up 19% in ONE DAY. If every day you could pick the one stock that would go up the most that day, you could have gains of 10 to 20% every day. Great in theory, the catch is knowing what that stock will be.

Lots of smart people devote their lives to timing the market, and most of them are not particularly successful at it. If you're trying to just do it as a sideline to your regular job, well, I wouldn't say it's hopeless, but the odds are against you.

Most of the time, you're just better to keep putting money in. In the long run, the market has always gone up eventually.


A short quiz: If you plan to eat hamburgers throughout your life and are not a cattle producer, should you wish for higher or lower prices for beef? Likewise, if you are going to buy a car from time to time but are not an auto manufacturer, should you prefer higher or lower car prices? These questions, of course, answer themselves.

But now for the final exam: If you expect to be a net saver during the next five years, should you hope for a higher or lower stock market during that period? Many investors get this one wrong. Even though they are going to be net buyers of stocks for many years to come, they are elated when stock prices rise and depressed when they fall. In effect, they rejoice because prices have risen for the "hamburgers" they will soon be buying. This reaction makes no sense. Only those who will be sellers of equities in the near future should be happy at seeing stocks rise. Prospective purchasers should much prefer sinking prices.

Warren Buffett - 1997 Chairmans letter

What Warren is trying to tell you is that you've had nearly the best luck possible in your 401(k), which you mistakenly view as a "complete waste".

The whole idea of saving in your 401k is to grow it as much as possible before your retirement nears. You are mistakenly wanting on your share prices to increase in the short run, when the opposite is to your benefit. If you invest money on a regular basis to purchase shares, bear markets allow the same invested amount to buy more shares, bull markets mean you'll purchase fewer shares. By the time you retire, purchasing shares cheaply can substantially increase your total account value.

So stop obsessing over your 401k performance, it's a long game and investing steadily is the way to win it. And don't despair when stock prices fall substantially, instead rejoice thinking about how much it will ultimately benefit your retirement.


Depending on your 401k provider, there are choices of funds of cash or cash-equivalents.

They have a very poor return, but usually they don't fluctuate up and down. It's like you would keep your 401k contribution in cash.

As previous answers said, it is very hard to predict when the market would go down. If you don't predict, you will lose the opportunity of your money to grow. Also, if you buy on a bullish market, it may be that you just bought at the highest price, and the market will go down.

On my knowledge, it is impossible to short sell stocks with the 401k money. As short sale would use your money to gamble against the economy, I see plenty of reasons why the government will not provide tax incentives for such a behavior.

  • It’s good to know the cash option exists although I’ve been convinced not to use it Mar 28, 2018 at 12:57
  • Not necessary. I've moved everything I have to cash at the beginning of February. Never believe that the financial advisers work for you; most of them want your money for commissions, management, etc. Of course, a customer recording losses is an unhappy customer, but still a customer. Their advice and your interests are not necessary well aligned. My point: no financial adviser will tell you to invest in cash funds, because such funds don't pay substantial commission, compared to more risky ones.
    – user70520
    Mar 28, 2018 at 20:56

The 'buck' fund

If you want to put money on hold, you can usually invest it in a 'cash' or money market fund. The price per share is usually a dollar and it is somewhere you can put the money while you are waiting for a dip.

Inflation is not your friend

The downside is, although the money is safe (they rarely "break the buck"), you are unlikely make enough from the fund to beat inflation (typically 2%), so in practice you're losing 2% per year for every year you have your money in 'cash'.

Buying the Dip

If an opportunity comes up (e.g. the market goes down by 10%) then it allows you to switch out from that fund into a market based one (e.g. an S&P 500 tracker) and 'buy the dip'.

I tend to wait for small corrections and transfer part of my 'cash' fund into the market, and then when the market reaches all time highs, transfer from the market back out.

You can also have your contributions from your pay check go into the 'cash' fund, and then apply them when the timing is better.

Timing Issues

While I agree that it is impossible to time the market perfectly, a strategy where you put money in and take money out when the market corrects or rallies, can offer a slight improvement.

Redemption Fees

One thing to be aware of is some funds will charge redemption fees if the amount of the fund you are converting is too high (e.g. more than 20%). You should check the fund's prospectus to make sure you are not going to get hurt with additional fees. My 401k provider puts a dollar symbol icon next to the funds that have higher redemption fees.

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .