2

Traditional IRA

Suppose I want to deposit $5500 by tax day 2018 in order to qualify for a 2017 tax year deposit, but I don't have the cash at the moment.

Let's say I expect to have the cash within 60 days. And let's say my IRA currently has $10000.

Can I use the 60 day IRA borrow rule to withdraw $5500 from the account, then deposit that $5500 before tax day 2018 to count it for 2017 tax year, while still technically owing my IRA the $5500 I borrowed?

I would be withdrawing and redepositing the same $5500, ending up with the same $10k in the account, but I will be able to claim I deposited $5500 for 2017 tax year. I would then have nearly 60 days to come up with the $5500 I borrowed and deposit it, bringing the account up to $15500.

4

I think what you're proposing is doable. You would be making a contribution in the middle of a 60-day indirect rollover; I don't think there's any rule against that. A couple of things to keep in mind:

  • You can only do one indirect rollover per year (across all accounts)
  • When you withdraw the $5500, you might not get the entire $5500; they might withhold a part for taxes. I am not sure whether there is an option to not withhold. (For withdrawing from Roth IRA, there probably is an option to not withhold, but for Traditional IRA I am not sure.) If they withhold some and you don't get the full $5500, you must still re-deposit $5500 for the contribution and another $5500 for the rollover.
  • 401(k) ? Mandatory 20% withholding. IRA, no required Federal withholding. – JTP - Apologise to Monica Mar 24 '18 at 19:38
  • 1
    @JoeTaxpayer , my 401k allows withdrawals with no tax held. I did that last year with a six-digit amount (I put it into Roth IRA). I don‘t know the laws, but on their website, the question where I decide ‘no tax withheld’ comes before the decision where the money goes. – Aganju Mar 25 '18 at 4:19
4

Make the 2017 contribution into a new IRA account, removing all doubt as to your intent.

  • 1
    But a rollover is also intended for you to move it to a new account too, so I don't see how this clears anything up. – user102008 Mar 25 '18 at 0:36
  • Harper makes the point that if OP fears the deposit will be mistaken as the re-deposit, i.e. the return of funds, by opening a new account, he can be sure this won't occur. This might not be strictly necessary, but is a brilliant way to avoid sure an error. +1. – JTP - Apologise to Monica Mar 25 '18 at 14:22

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.