If you look at BHP's income statement, you see that it has
Cost of revenue -
Why does it have zero as cost of revenue? Forescue, their competitors, tell a different story.
What am I missing?
Personal Finance & Money Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people who want to be financially literate. It only takes a minute to sign up.Sign up to join this community
Note that BHP is an Australian company, so their financial reporting standards are different, wihch makes it more challenging to "normalize" them to the standard breakout that Yahoo uses.
I don't believe presentation of a specific cost of goods breakdown is required, and in fact, allocating costs this way may result in significant and arbitrary judgement in a number of instances.
For example, Forescue (FMG) sell one product -- iron ore -- from a cluster of nearby assets in Western Australia. On the other hand, BHP is a mining conglomerate with diversified worldwide operations.
If you want to compare BHP's and FMG's iron ore efficiency, then a more apples to apples approach would be to review page 90 of the BHP 2017 annual report (section 1.13.3) which outlines iron ore specific income and asset items.