My 16 year old son backed our van into his grandmother's car last night, causing minor damage to one door on her car, though nothing noticeable on our van. I estimate that it will cost a few hundred dollars to fix, likely placing it below our deductible, though I have heard that property damage claims like this may be exempt from deductibles. I would like to discuss this with my insurance agent to decide the most economical way to proceed. However, I am concerned that this discussion may cause them to raise my rates, even if no claim is filed. Can they do this? Would I have any recourse if they did, besides just changing companies?

  • 3
    Are you sure you're not obliged to tell them about it anyway? Nov 8 '17 at 20:48
  • 1
    Might be, I don't know. That's part of the problem. Kinda weird to be asking them "So, hypothetically, if we were to have a minor accident--not saying we did--are we obligated to tell you even if we don't file a claim?"
    – techturtle
    Nov 9 '17 at 1:55
  • Read your contract (or call the agent and ask for a copy of it, if you don't have it already) Nov 9 '17 at 5:39
  • I bet they can, just fix it out of pocket. It really is impossible to know without a bunch more of information.
    – Pete B.
    Nov 9 '17 at 11:57
  • Liability claims (that is, when you are liable for damage to another party) are not subject to a deductible. Deductibles only apply to damage to your own vehicle (collision or comprehensive coverage) where your insurance is paying you; this is intended to shift some burden to you and to keep you from making (many) small claims for minor things.
    – Istanari
    Nov 9 '17 at 13:17

The estimate we got from the body shop was a lot more than we expected, so we just went ahead and filed a claim. Since "what happens if we don't file a claim" was no longer an option, I talked with my agent about these questions, so here's what I found.

  • Because this was only damage to one car, not ours, it was a liability property damage claim, and therefore no deductible for us.
  • I was under no obligation to them to report the claim, though I am responsible for the accident (financially either they or I have to handle it).
  • Had I called to discuss possibilities, they would not have adjusted our rates as a result.
  • If I start a claim and close it at any time before a payment is made, it will not change our rates.
  • There will likely be an increase in my rates, but if and how much will depend on what the repairs cost.

Nota Bene: This is for one insurance carrier, and may even vary from policy to policy, but I think it is likely to be similar with most US insurance companies.

  • Thanks for adding an answer, that's good information. The last bullet is interesting, though. I would have thought that your rates were based on the probability of future accidents and that the cost of the prior accident would be irrelevant. Whether you hit a Bentley or a Yugo, your changes of a future accident are the same. Perhaps they're trying to make up for additional costs that they did not factor into their risk analysis, though.
    – D Stanley
    Nov 9 '17 at 21:54
  • @DStanley They presumably have an actuarial figure for the "expected cost of damages caused by a 16-year-old" (averaged over Bentleys and Yugos). My guess is in a totally fair world, the premiums should only rise if there is evidence to suggest that actual claims will exceed this expected value... so the value of this claim could play a part, but, I would say, only if there is other evidence that this is not an "expected" claim (e.g. if this was the fourth such claim in as many months; over the "average" of a 16-year-old).
    – TripeHound
    Nov 10 '17 at 8:21

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.