I should preface that I am a self employed sole trader in my early twenties, and a basic rate taxpayer averaging somewhere between £28-32,000 per annum. The variation not only arises due to the nature of my consultancy work, but also because I actually serve as an independent contractor for a US company, so am paid in a dollar wage converted.

I am trying to evaluate which is more advantageous given my situation for saving into a pension - a Lifetime ISA, or a SIPP? I already have a Help To Buy ISA too, so I believe I would have to potentially transfer this and make use of the transfer window this tax year.

I read the following link: MSE - Lifetime ISAs when I noticed the following line:

WARNING! Unless you're a self-employed basic-rate taxpayer, using a pension to save for retirement is likely to be far better than a LISA

I am self-employed, and I am basic-rate... although these circumstances may change and (hopefully) I would see an income raise that may put me in a higher tax bracket. My father (employed, higher earnings) recommended a HL Vantage SIPP saying that the returns in later years skyrocket as interest compounds, even though it may seem insignificant currently.

That said, I feel this may not be making best use of my funds right now, especially given that I will probably still end up wanting to purchase a house at some point (another potential advantage of LISA) and also any other general attractions that I may wish to experience while being young enough to do so.

So - should I go for a LISA, or a SIPP - or even a stocks and shares ISA (I understand there's risk to capital involved)? Potentially a combination of the aforementioned?

1 Answer 1


Whilst you're a basic rate taxpayer, and you have LISA allowance left, a LISA is the best bet.

With a pension, you get to save tax as you put into the pension, and your money grows tax-free. But when you take it out, most of the money is subject to income tax like any other income, though you can take 25% tax-free.

In contrast, the LISA comes from after-tax income, gets a government bonus of 25%, and then grows tax-free and you can take the money out tax-free.

So if you have £100 of gross income now, the two scenarios work out as:

  • Pension: Get £80 of take-home pay, put it in your pension where it gets "grossed up" againt to the original £100. It grows, say by 100% to keep the maths simple, and you end up with £200 in your pension fund.
    • If you are below the personal allowance when you take it out, you can take it all out tax-free and you have £200.
    • If you are a basic rate taxpayer, you can take out £50 tax-free, pay 20% tax on the rest, and you have £170.
  • LISA: Get £80 of take-home pay, put it in your LISA where it becomes £100 with the government bonus. It grows, again by 100%, and you end up with £200 in your LISA which you can always take out tax-free.

A LISA also gives you more options: with a pension you'll be able to take out your money probably at age 57 and possibly a bit later if they increase the age again, with a LISA you'll either be able to take it out at age 60, or to buy your first home.

Once you have filled up the LISA allowance - which is £4k/year - the decision is a bit harder. You can either use a normal ISA, which doesn't have the government bonus, or a pension. Given the 25% tax-free part, a pension is usually better. For example in the above scenario, with a normal ISA, you end up with £160.

Note that the choice of tax-exempt wrapper is mostly independent of what you invest in - e.g. stocks and shares, or whatever. You'll need to choose a provider that offers the investments you want, and look carefully at their charges. Either way the growth while inside the wrapper is tax-free.

Once you become a higher-rate taxpayer, the balance above changes, and the pension probably wins just in terms of money available at retirement. But the LISA contributions you made while a basic-rate taxpayer were still worthwhile. Also you might choose to keep focusing on the LISA even as a higher-rate taxpayer, if you're more interested in using the money as a deposit on a first home than on saving for retirement.

  • Thanks for the fast response, Ganesh! I have a couple queries then, regarding your answer. Firstly, would you recommend a cash LISA or S&S LISA? Given my H2B ISA is already a cash ISA I wouldn't be able to make the switch now until next tax year. Secondly, what would the threshold be where a Pension would grow at a rate faster than the LISA and thus be more viable, despite the additional taxation?
    – Talisman
    Aug 2, 2017 at 19:06
  • 1
    @Talisman S&S versus Cash - that's really up to you and how much risk you want to take. On average, over the long-term, S&S usually outperform cash. But it's riskier. Aug 2, 2017 at 19:27
  • 1
    @Talisman if you invested a Pension or a LISA in the same thing (e.g. some specific stocks fund) with the same charges, then they would grow at the same rate. Aug 2, 2017 at 19:28
  • Thank you. If I'm understanding this correctly then, there shouldn't be any issue with filling up a S&S LISA and then putting the rest in a S&S SIPP? With no employer to match me on pension contributions, I feel I would need significantly more than the £4k/yr allowance afforded to me by the government.
    – Talisman
    Aug 2, 2017 at 19:52
  • 1
    @Talisman: correct, but with any S&S investments, do look closely at the charges as they can eat away at your returns. Aug 2, 2017 at 19:56

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.