2

I would like to transfer money from Argentina into Chile.

Usually, within countries, there are safe ways of physically (i.e. without a SWIFT or other wire) and inexpensively transferring money between accounts without cash. For example, marking a cheque as Account Payee, so that the money can only be moved into that account.

Is there a safe way to do something similar internationally, but without electronic means such as SWIFT or Wire Transfers? (I found that electronic means are quite expensive)

Do such cheques exist? Are there similar alternatives?

It's ok if, like with national cheques, the money is ultimately transferred or credited electronically behind the scenes, as long as it is made available immediately and there is no 1-7 business days wait as with SWIFT transfers.

  • 2
    Why not do the same thing internationally? – Michael Aug 1 '17 at 22:38
  • Do what? Use a check? I don't think checks produced in one country are valid in another, even if they are in the same currency but I may be wrong. – Norbert Aug 1 '17 at 23:25
  • Does anyone know why the question may have been downvoted? I'm new to money.stackexchange and I genuinely have no idea what's wrong with it. – Norbert Aug 2 '17 at 3:44
  • 1
    The question is not whether there is a slow and expensive way to move money internationally. I'm aware there is. It is about whether there is a safe way to physically move money internationally. – Norbert Aug 2 '17 at 3:49
  • 1
    An (ordinary) cheque will never do what you want. Even a "same country" cheque takes several days to clear before the money is (fully) available; it stands to reason that a trans-country cheque (if possible at all) will take even longer to clear. The only other non-electronic possibility (than travellers' cheques mentioned below) that comes to mind would be a trans-national equivalent of a cashier's cheque / banker's draft, but if these exist, I suspect they'd be both expensive and only work between limited institutions. – TripeHound Aug 2 '17 at 7:25
4

Traveller's cheques. That's exactly what they were intended for. Their usage has dropped a lot since everyone can use ATMs in foreign countries, but they still exist.

  • 1
    Thank you. I tried upvoting but I don't have enough reputation yet. – Norbert Aug 2 '17 at 5:54
  • @Norbert hopefully you have enough rep now. gave you an upvote on the question – CQM Aug 2 '17 at 6:20
  • haha yes! Thank you. I could now upvote the answer. – Norbert Aug 2 '17 at 6:52
2

I assume the same criteria apply for this as your previous question. You want to physically transfer in excess of 50,000 USD multiple times a week and you want the transportation mechanism to be instant or very quick.

I don't believe there is any option that won't raise serious red flags with the government entities you cross the boundaries of. Even a cheque, which a person in the comments of OP's question suggests, wouldn't be sufficient due to government regulation requiring banks to put holds on such large amounts.

  • Thanks. I too am not aware of any way of doing it. Hence the question. – Norbert Aug 1 '17 at 23:24
  • You misunderstand @Norbert. It is not that there were not ways to do it. My answer is that there are ways to do it but not ways that won't raise serious flags with state entities. – Lan Aug 2 '17 at 1:00
  • I'm not concerned about raising red flags since it is all perfectly (and provably, with a v) legal and legitimate. I would just show them the documents they ask for, no matter how many or how long. If you do know of ways, it would be tremendously helpful if you could share them. – Norbert Aug 2 '17 at 3:38
2

There are checks, international wire transfers (SWIFT), depending on country pair remittance services.

  • Are you aware of checks being valid across national borders? Is this so in general or only between a few country pairs? Are they valid even if the currency in the check is different from the currency in the beneficiary account (hence requiring exchanging it at the beneficiary bank)? Much appreciated. SWIFT won't work because it is not a physical means of transport. It is electronic. – Norbert Aug 2 '17 at 3:42

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.