19

I realize that this is similar to at least one question here, however, there are some differentiators.

I can contribute a max of 5% of my net salary to the 401k fund. The employer matches 50% of whatever I contribute. So at most, the employer will be contributing 2.5% of my salary.

Questions:

  1. Should I be contributing the max to achieve the best bang for the buck?
  2. How should I split the money? My employer is setup with Fidelity and they have a bunch of funds of which I know little about. In the past, I've basically picked 10 funds and gave each fund 10% of the contribution. That didn't really turn out all that well. I got murdered in both .com bubble and the 2007/2008 meltdown. What should I be looking at?
|improve this question
  • 11
    Question: Do you like free money? If so, taking whatever it takes to get the match makes good sense. – MrChrister May 9 '11 at 22:13
  • Don't be too hard on yourself. Almost everybody lost a lot at both of those times. Check to see how you did relative to a major index like the S&P 500. Use that as a benchmark. – Stainsor May 10 '11 at 12:57
  • No matter how you split your contributions to keep your investment strategy going you have to remember to re-balance the current balance every 3 to 6 months. This has the added benefit of helping to even out the ups and downs by forcing you to take profits and invest in potential value areas. – Justin Ohms Jul 7 '11 at 17:46
  • Ten funds is too many. The point about Mutual funds is that they do the diversification for you. You can't possibly keep up to date on the holdings of ten mutual funds. – DJClayworth Jul 8 '11 at 17:02
16

JoeTapayer has good advice here. I would like to add my notes.

If they give a 50% match that means you are getting a 50% return on investment(ROI) immediately. I do not know of a way to get a better guaranteed ROI.

Next, when investing you need to determine what kind of investor you are. I would suggest you make yourself more literate in investments, as I suggest to anyone, but there are basic things you want to look for.

If your primary worry is loss of your prinicipal, go for Conservative investments. This means that you are willing to accept a reduced expected ROI in exchange for lower volatility(risk of loss of principal). This does not mean you have a 100% safe investment as the last market issues have shown, but in general you are better protected. The fidelity investments should give you some information as to volatility or if they deem the investments conservative.

Conservative investments are normally made up of trading bonds, which have the lowest ROI in general but are the most secure. You can also invest in blue chip companies, although stock is inherently riskier. It is pointed out in comments that stocks always outperform bonds in the long term, and this has been true over the last 100 years. I am just suggesting ways you can protect yourself against market downturns. When the market is doing very well bonds will not give you the return your friends are seeing.

I am just trying to give you a basic idea of what to look for when you pick your investments, nothing can replace a solid investment adviser and taking the time to educate yourself.

|improve this answer
  • 6
    Don't take Kortuk's advice to invest conservatively without understanding the alternatives. I'm not saying it's bad advice, but you should understand what you're potentially giving up by weighting heavily on bonds. In general, stocks will give you a couple of percentage points better return in the long run, but will subject you to bigger swings. Generally, most people want to stay heavier on stocks when retirement is far off, and shift more to bonds as retirement approaches. This depends on your risk tolerance, and is something you should discuss with a qualified financial advisor. – Mike Piche May 10 '11 at 3:47
  • 1
    @MikePiche, I was not trying to say to invest in bonds with everything, i was trying to give examples of very secure investments. please forgive me if I may have been misleading. I have 20% of my portfolio in bonds, just hurricane day money. Retirment is a good distance off and I can absorb the increased volatility of stocks. The OP seems to have issues with the large losses he incurred during previous bear markets, the only way to minimize this would be conservative investments. I am a strong supporter of consulting a financial adviser or training yourself to be an investment adviser. – Kortuk May 10 '11 at 4:03
  • @MikePiche, I noticed some errors in what I wrote, I normally do the best coming back a day later and updating my post and I plan to. Please forgive my grammatical errors. – Kortuk May 10 '11 at 4:06
  • 2
    "If they give a 50% match that means you are getting a 50% return on investment(ROI) immediately." Nicely stated. +1 – gef05 May 10 '11 at 14:22
  • @gef05, sometimes people I talk to know about investing and skip the 401k because of poor options, putting it as a 50% ROI they never skip it. Thank you for the +1. – Kortuk May 10 '11 at 14:27
8

You can only contribute up to 5% of your salary? Odd. Usually 401(k) contributions are limited to some dollar amount in the vicinity of $15,000 or so a year. Normal retirement guidelines suggest that putting away 10-15% of your salary is enough that you probably won't need to worry much when you retire. 5% isn't likely to be enough, employer match or no. I'd try to contribute 10-15% of my salary. I think you're reading the rules wrong. I'm almost certain. It's definitely worth checking. If you're not, you should seriously consider supplementing this saving with a Roth IRA or just an after-tax account.

So. If you're with Fidelity and don't know what to do, look for a target date fund with a date near your retirement (e.g. Target Retirement 2040) and put 100% in there until you have a better idea of what going on. All Fidelity funds have pretty miserable expense ratios, even their token S&P500 index fund from another provider, so you might as let them do some leg work and pick your asset allocation for you. Alternatively, look for the Fidelity retirement planner tools on their website to suggest an asset allocation.

As a (very rough) rule of thumb, as you're saving for retirement you'll want to have N% of your portfolio in bonds and the rest in stocks, where N is your age in years. Your stocks should probably be split about 70% US and 30% rest-of-world, give or take, and your US stocks should be split about 64% large-cap, 28% mid-cap and 8% small-cap (that's basically how the US stock market is split).

|improve this answer
  • I think the 5% is how much they feel they can comfortably contribute. – MrChrister May 10 '11 at 2:11
  • 2
    I didn't read it that way. If 5% is all you can comfortably contribute, sit down and take a good look at some retirement planning tools and projections and make sure you're not setting yourself up for disappointment - saving more might be uncomfortable now, but it could be a whole lot worse later if you don't save. – user296 May 10 '11 at 3:33
  • every company I have a friend working at and my company all do % based contribution. All of my friends have 100% match to a percentage with different levels of vestment. – Kortuk May 10 '11 at 4:52
  • on that note, your advice was excellent. I have heard the rule of thumb with age to bond investment, but honestly, I forgot about it. I think that was part of my way of picking how much money I put in bonds. +1 – Kortuk May 10 '11 at 5:21
7

For your first question, the general guidelines I've seen recommended are as follows:

  1. Max out your employer's match. In your case, put the 5% in and voila! You've made 50% already!
  2. Max out an IRA account. There's a lot of arguments for Traditional vs. Roth, but since you can only contribute a certain amount per yer, you should do it now (especially if you're pursuing the Roth option and don't have a Roth 401k available). Consider reading this link for an argument why Traditional might be better than Roth.
  3. Max out your 401k (if possible; I know I don't have the extra $15k/year sitting around)
  4. Consider putting any remaining funds into your mortgage if you have one; it's like getting a guaranteed X% over the remainder of the loan where X is your mortgage interest rate, which makes your retirement cheaper by time you get there.

As to your second question, portfolio management is something you should familiarize yourself with. If you trust it to other people, don't be surprised when they make "mistakes". Remember, they get paid regardless of whether you make money. Consider how much any degree of risk will affect you. When starting out, your contributions make up most of the growth of your accounts; now is the time when you can most afford to take higher risk for higher payouts (still limiting your risk as much as possible, of course). A 10% loss on a portfolio of $50k can be replaced with a good year's contributions. Once your portfolio has grown to a much larger sum, it will be time to dial back the risk and focus on preserving your capital.

When choosing investments, always treat your porfolio as a whole - including non-retirement assets (other investment accounts, savings, even your house). Don't put too many eggs from every account into the same basket, or you'll find that 30% of your porfolio is a single investment. Also consider that some investments have different tax consequences, and you can leverage the properties of each account to offset that.

|improve this answer
  • +1 for "When choosing investments, always treat your porfolio as a whole. " I would add also include your portfolio outside of your retirement account, savings, CDs, home. – Justin Ohms Jul 7 '11 at 17:41
6

First - yes, take the 2.5%. It could be better, but it's better than many get.

Second - choosing from "a bunch" can be tough. Start by looking at the expenses for each. Read a bit of the description, if you can't tell your spouse what the fund's goal is, don't buy it.

|improve this answer
5

Contribute as much as you can.

When do you want to retire and how much income do you think you'll need? A $1M portfolio yielding 5% will yield $50,000/year.

Do some research about how to build a portfolio... this site is a good start, but check out books on retirement planning and magazines like Money and Kiplinger. If you don't speak "money" or are intimidated by investing, look for a fee-based financial advisor whom you are comfortable with.

|improve this answer
  • 1
    And 50K just ain't that much today, so it will be less in the future. +1 as much as you can. – MrChrister May 10 '11 at 2:10
  • 5
    duff - I recommend depositing as much as will be matched, and then usually going outside, a Roth or Traditional IRA. It's a rare 401(k) that has fees and investment choices better than you can get at a brokerage account. 401(k) advantage is the ability to borrow up to 50%/$50K from the account, but aside from that, the other differences aren't enough to negate the higher fees/ fewer choices. – JTP - Apologise to Monica♦ May 10 '11 at 2:59
  • @JoeTaxpayer Good point. My employer has had an excellent plan, and I've been spoiled by that! We have a good selection of funds, plus a PCRA option where we can buy whatever funds or ETFs we wish. – duffbeer703 May 10 '11 at 16:47
  • Thx, yes, same deal here. First 5% matched 100%, and our S&P index fee is .02%. Brokerage account attached as well. But I've learned that many 401(k)s are so bad, I have to ask and warn. – JTP - Apologise to Monica♦ May 10 '11 at 18:41

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.