As an example, my parents told me that their current car loan is amortized. Does that make any practical difference to how they pay off their loan, as opposed to if their loan had not been amortized?

  • Maybe this will help.
    – mikeazo
    Commented Mar 14, 2016 at 15:44
  • @JonH That's what I couldn't figure out before, whether amortization was bad or not. From MD-Tech's answer below, it seems like amortized loans are what I thought of as "normal" loans before (pay some principal and some interest), as opposed to only paying the interest. If that's the only difference between the two, it seems like amortized loans would be much better than interest-only loans. Commented Mar 14, 2016 at 19:11
  • Maybe the housing bubble was due to all the non-amortizing loans...those seem very risky. No thank you I will stick to my traditional 15 year fixed rate no apr no pmi etc etc...
    – JonH
    Commented Mar 14, 2016 at 19:22

1 Answer 1


Amortizing loans pay off some of the value of the loan (otherwise known as principal) with each payment, whereas non-amortizing loans only pay the interest, so the full value of the loan is still owed at the end of the loan.

This means that with an amortizing loan you progressively pay off the loan value bit by bit as time goes on.

  • 2
    May want to add that because you pay off a small portion with each payment, the interest is less with an amortizing loan, since you don't have to pay interest on principle you've already paid back.
    – corsiKa
    Commented Mar 14, 2016 at 21:10

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .