I'm new to the world of Value Investing (and investing in general) and am trying to fully understand the fundamentals in calculating the Owner's Earnings of a company.

According to this blog, Owner's Earnings can be calculated as follows:

Owner Earnings =

(a) Net Income

+ (b) depreciation, amortization

+/- (b) other non cash charges

- (c) annual maintenance capex (or the full capex)

+/- changes in working capital

However, I can see in LVS' 2005 Annual Report (pg. 80) that the deprecation and amortization is already deducted in the calculation of the Net Income for the year. Is this typical in the reporting of Net Income? If so, then why are we deducting it twice in the calculation for Owner's Earnings?

1 Answer 1


This formula is not calculating "Earnings". Instead, it is calculating "Free Cash Flow from Operations".

As the original poster notes, the "Earnings" calculation subtracted out depreciation and amortization. The "Free Cash Flow from Operations" adds these values back, but for two different reasons:

  • Depreciation is a non-cash charge. Depreciation is an estimate of the decline in value of an asset due to age, wear, and tear. But until/unless you decide you need to repair or replace the asset, depreciation does not require you to spend money out-of-pocket. (And even if you do spend money to repair or replace the asset, those costs appear elsewhere: repair costs are costs that have already been subtracted when calculating earnings, and replacement would be a capital expenditure.)
  • Amortization of mortgage bonds does require cash out-of-pocket. This reduces your debt, so it is one way of using your free cash flow. In other words, the principal payments on your mortgage reduce your "Cash Flow from Financing Activities".
  • Seems to make sense. Does it really matter if we subtract the cost of an asset using deprecation vs subtracting it from the averaged maintenance capex though? It would seem to me to result in the same outcome. Also, is it standard reporting that such asset costs actually be reported under capex? Enough so that I can rely on it to be?
    – kennyg
    Commented Oct 26, 2015 at 15:31

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .