2

If on 01/3/2015 I purchase 100 shares of XYZ for $50 ea. Then, on 01/6/2015 I purchase another 100 shares of XYZ for $30 each. Then, on 01/17/2015 I sell my entire position, 200 shares of XYZ for $35 each. I'm not sure if this is a wash sale because even though I bought on two separate occasion's, I liquidated the entire position at one time. I don't believe I purchased "replacement shares" because I didn't sell any XYZ in between the two purchase dates. However, technically I did incur a loss on the first 100 shares and made a profit on the second 100 shares. Please help.

2
  • I don't think so. Unless you buy shares after this (within 30 days) to try and offset your loss then it would be. Also, I think since you don't have a position at all it won't be either. - Not positive though so leaving as a comment for now. If anything maybe a partial wash for the 500 profit to help offset the 1500 loss.
    – Ross
    Oct 9, 2015 at 20:43
  • 1
    @Ross A wash sale is created not just by purchases after the sale, but purchases before, so the 1/6/15 purchase triggers the wash sale. Only 100 of the shares constitute the wash sale, but it's like being a little bit pregnant, you are or you aren't. :-) You're right that it doesn't matter, but that doesn't mean there isn't a wash sale. See my answer for details.
    – blm
    Oct 9, 2015 at 22:39

1 Answer 1

4

Yes. A wash sale is when you acquire a security "substantially identical to" one you sell for a loss, 30 days before or after the sale. You sold 100 shares of XYZ on 1/17/2015 for a $15/share loss, and had purchased "substantially identical" (in this case completely identical) shares within the 30 days before the sale, i.e. the 100 shares purchased on 01/06/2015. So 100 of the shares sold create a wash sale.

That being said, it doesn't matter (unless you had other trades of XYZ you didn't mention). The only thing a wash sale does is disallow the loss and make you add the difference to the basis of the purchased shares. So the $15/share loss of the 01/03/2015 shares is disallowed, but it's added to the 01/06/2015 shares making their basis $45/share. The math is:

Ignoring the wash sale rule:

01/03/2015 shares
 Buy 100 @ $50 = $5,000, sell 100 @ $35 = $3,500, net loss = $1,500
01/06/2015 shares
 Buy 100 @ $30 = $3,000, sell 100 @ $35 = $3,500, net gain = $500
Total net loss = $1,000

Taking into account the wash sale rule:

01/03/2015 shares
 Buy 100 @ $50 = $5,000, sell 100 @ $35 = $3,500, net loss = $1,500
  But the loss is disallowed and $1,500 is added to total basis of the 01/06/2015 shares,
  $0 net gain
01/06/2015 shares
 Buy 100 @ $30 = $3,000 + $1,500 from wash sale = $4,500,
  sell 100 @ $35 = $3,500, net loss = $1,000
Total net loss = $1,000

The only time a wash sale has any affect at all is when it happens over a tax year, then the wash sale is disallowed in one tax year but is taken into account the next year (or whenever the shares that were purchased to create the wash sale are sold).

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .