How is the price of an American Depository Receipt (ADR) determined?

An American Depository Receipt is a receipt that a non-U.S. share is held by a bank on behalf of the receipt holder. If you hold an ADR, you often have to pay an annual fee, but holding the underlying share does not incur this fee. This makes the underlying shares a little "better" than the ADRs. Because of the law of one price, this disadvantage of ADRs must be compensated by setting the ADR price a little lower than the price of the underlying shares. Otherwise, it would be profitable to take a short position in the ADR and a long position in the underlying share, and large institutional investors would take advantage of this.

If you take a long position in the underlying share and a short position in the ADR, you aren't taking any position in the company, but only in the ADR fee.

How much lower must the price of the ADR be? Does this affect ADR volumes? If the price drops too much below the value of the underlying shares, it becomes profitable for large institutional investors to buy ADRs, cancel them and sell the underlying shares.

  • 1
    I think you're forgetting that there may be administrative and legal hassles associated with non-U.S. shares, and as long as there are such hassles, the law of one price can't really be invoked, as there is some value to having an institution take care of those hassles for you (case in point: in some markets short-selling is banned, but you can still short-sell the ADR of shares in that market, what is the value-added of being able to short a share in a market where such behaviour is banned?) Sep 28 '14 at 3:07

Academic research into ADRs seems to suggest that pairs-trading ADRs and their underlying shares reveals that there certainly are arbitrage opportunities, but that in most (but not all cases) such opportunities are quickly taken care of by the market. (See this article for the mexican case, the introduction has a list of other articles you could read on the subject).

In some cases parity doesn't seem to be reached, which may have to do with transaction costs, the risk of transacting in a foreign market, as well as administrative & legal concerns that can affect the direct holder of a foreign share but don't impact the ADR holder (since those risks and costs are borne by the institution, which presumably has a better idea of how to manage such risks and costs).

It's also worth pointing out that there are almost always arbitrage opportunities that get snapped up quickly: the law of one price doesn't apply for very short time-frames, just that if you're not an expert in that particular domain of the market, it might as well be a law since you won't see the arbitrage opportunities fast enough. That is to say, there are always opportunities for arbitrage with ADRs but chances are YOU won't be able to take advantage of it (In the Mexican case, the price divergence seems to have an average half-life of ~3 days). Some price divergence might be expected: ADR holders shouldn't be expected to know as much about the foreign market as the typical foreign share holder, and that uncertainty may also cause some divergence.

There does seem to be some opportunity for arbitrage doing what you suggest in markets where it is not legally possible to short shares, but that likely is the value added from being able to short a share that belongs to a market where you can't do that.

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.