I understand the basics of stock splits. My question is, all else being equal is there any benefit to buying shares prior to versus subsequent to a split? As a hypothetical, imagine Apple's price stays the same between now and their split in June. Does it make more sense to buy before June 9th or on-or-after June 9th or does it not make any difference?

2 Answers 2


Assuming you plan to buy a whole number of shares and have a maximum dollar value you intend to invest, it may be better to wait for the split if the figures don't quite work out nicely.

For example, if you are going to invest $1,000 and the stock pre-split is $400 and the split is 2 for 1, then you'd buy 2 shares before the split unless you have an extra $200 to add. Meanwhile, after the split you could buy 5 shares at $200 so that you invest all that you intend.

Aside from that case, it doesn't really make a difference since the split is similar to getting 2 nickels for a dime which in each case is still a total value of 10 cents.

  • 11
    I can't help but wonder if a split creates a bit of upside pressure as the stock will be more attractive to the regular folk. Commented May 7, 2014 at 18:54
  • If there's more incentive to purchase and therefore purchasing pressure after the split as you're saying, won't that mean that the relative price is higher after the split?
    – AlexQueue
    Commented May 7, 2014 at 21:26
  • Sometimes though not always. Microsoft would be an example of a company that hasn't moved much yet has had more than a few splits.
    – JB King
    Commented May 7, 2014 at 21:36
  • 4
    @JoeTaxpayer The theory behind a split is that the stock will be more attractive to buyers at a lower price, and more demand should translate to an increase in price. But to what extent this works and how fast ... ? I wonder if anyone has done a study on this. This is all more about psychology than mathematics. Perhaps the announcement of an upcoming split attracts attention and itself puts upward pressure on the price.
    – Jay
    Commented May 8, 2014 at 21:56
  • Thanks to both of you for the great answers. I learned a lot. Accepting JB King's as it had the most upvotes.
    – JP.
    Commented May 13, 2014 at 2:45

There has been a lot of research on the effects of stock splits. Some studies have concluded that:

  • there is an abnormal positive return on stock split announcement date (i.e. on average you would have made money by buying stocks right before a split is announced and selling right after - which is obviously not possible to implement in practice since it would be insider trading!)
  • there is an abnormal positive return on ex date (when the stock starts trading post split)
  • liquidity decreases right after the announcement date
  • volatility increases after the ex date

However note that (i) these are averages over large samples and does not say it will work on every split and (ii) most of the research is a bit dated and more recent papers have often struggled to find any significant performance impact after 1990, possibly because the effect has been well documented and the arbitrage no longer exists.

This document summarises the existing research on the subject although it seems to miss some of the more recent papers.

More practically, if you pay a commission per share, you will pay more commissions after the split than before.

Bottom line: don't overthink it and focus on other criteria to decide when/whether to invest.

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .