5

Can someone tell me what my vote means when asked to vote FOR or AGAINST an Advisory Approval of Executive Compensation on a Proxy Vote.

2
  • 5
    did you read the documents they included in the mailing? Mar 15, 2014 at 18:15
  • Advisory means non-binding, doesn't it? So what's the point of a non binding vote? How do you actually vote against pay packages if you think the directors are overpaid? Mar 31, 2021 at 17:53

2 Answers 2

6

This is a requirement that was added by the SEC which requires any shareholder to say-on-vote as to the compensation of the executives:

Companies are required to provide an advisory shareholder vote on the compensation of the top executives of the company – typically, the CEO, the Chief Financial Officer (CFO), and at least three other named executive officers. Companies are not required to use any specific language in asking for shareholder approval. Instead, each company has the flexibility to craft the exact language of the non-binding resolution that its shareholders will vote on.

[source]

The proxy vote, I get them for several companies myself, simply allow you to say what you think. You can choose to vote FOR, AGAINST, or ABSTAIN. The results are generally posted within 3 days of the votes being tabulated. Whatever the majority of the votes, including special assessment for higher value votes, will decide the outcome. The language used can be standard or crafted.

2
  • Instead of standard, we call it "boilerplate" :o) I like "crafted" as a term for non-standard. It seems familiar too, though I can't recall the context. Apr 3, 2014 at 16:03
  • @FeralOink, yes :) but as an attorney the legalese can confuse people, so I try to use as plain a language as I can in my posts to generalize for all audiences, but you are absolutely correct. Apr 3, 2014 at 22:24
2

Do you think that the executive deserves to be paid the amount of money proposed or not? It is your company, partially, so you get a say in these decisions. Read the proxy document. It will say how much cash and/or deferred compensation (in what form) is being voted on. If you aren't sure whether it is too high or not enough, you should check the company board of directors' recommendation, also included in your proxy docs. They almost always recommend in favor, so that won't tell you much, but you should have a quick look.

I recall that the SEC changed the proxy voting law in 2011 or so. You can either vote FOR or AGAINST. There used to be a third choice, ABSTAIN but I believe that it was effectively rendered equivalent to just heaving the proxy vote docs in the trash and not voting at all.

Take 10 minutes to browse the proxy material. You might find it more interesting than you expect. Even if not, it is good for you, since proxy votes can include proposals by shareholders; not "activist shareholders" like Carl Icahn, but actual minority shareholders whose interests are probably aligned with yours. In that case, the board of directors might suggest voting against the proposed change.

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .