4

Let's say every month I transfer $559, which is about 3 shares of VOO. The commission from Fidelity is $7.95, which is about 1.42%. Is it worth doing that, or better, every other month buy worth of $1118 of VOO and pay the same $7.95 commission?

Is there a general guideline for buying a certain amount of an ETF when paying a commission?

Improve this question
6

Neither. For frequent small purchases, use an indexed mutual fund. The benefit is no commission, and the ability to invest the exact amount you wish each month.

Improve this answer
6
  • 1
    IVV trades commission free at Fidelity.
    – CodeCrack
    Feb 20 '14 at 0:16
  • 1
    Assuming you can find one with expense ratios as low as ETFs while meeting the minimum investment requirements.
    – Craig W
    Feb 20 '14 at 0:20
  • 1
    VFIAX .05% low enough? Me? I'll stick with VIIIX .02% or to put into perspective $200 per $million per year
    – JTP - Apologise to Monica ♦
    Feb 20 '14 at 0:26
  • 1
    As long as the OP doesn't mind switching brokerages to Vanguard, and has the $10,000 minimum investment for VFIAX, or $200 million minimum investment for VIIIX.
    – Craig W
    Feb 20 '14 at 0:32
  • I missed the min on the first fund. The second is offered through 401(K) providers.
    – JTP - Apologise to Monica ♦
    Feb 20 '14 at 0:45
2

Likely a far better alternative than buying VOO monthly or every two months would be to buy IVV, the iShares S&P 500 ETF, so very similar to VOO but with a slightly higher expense ratio of 0.07% versus 0.05%. It trades commission free at Fidelity so you can buy as often as practical. Unless you are buying a very large number of shares at once (tens of thousands of dollars worth, I would guess), and keeping them for several years, I doubt that 0.02% expense ratio difference will outweigh the $7.95 commission.

Improve this answer
4
  • 1
    I disagree. 0.01 in expense ratio will cover the 7.95 commission in about a year and a quarter at this amount. So unless the OP plans on holding for less than 2.5 years, VOO makes more sense, even if buying for $660/month and selling each position separately.
    – littleadv
    Feb 19 '14 at 23:51
  • 1
    Can you break down the numbers? I might be calculating the expense ratio wrong but it seems like… VOO expense ratio is 0.05% btw and IVV is 0.07% Let's use 3 years as an example. Commission paid each month = 7.95 x 12 x 3 = $286.2 paid in commission in 3 years… Now the 0.02% expense ratio difference is.. 0.02% of 559 each month is 0.1118 x 12 = 1.3416 x 3 years = $4.0248
    – CodeCrack
    Feb 20 '14 at 0:10
  • 5
    @littleadv - .01% or as they say 1 basis point, is 1/100 of a percent, or $1 per $10,000 per year. There's a break even but it's a bit longer.
    – JTP - Apologise to Monica ♦
    Feb 20 '14 at 0:17
  • 2
    @JoeTaxpayer oh right:)
    – littleadv
    Feb 20 '14 at 0:17

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.