Why is it said that early exercise of a (call) option is not recommended and it is always better to sell the option instead?

Is it just to avoid assignment fees?

Of course, we assume that the option became in-the-money before expiry date.

  • There are a number of reasons why you might want to exercise, but the prevailing truth in the market is that most people actually don't want the underlying goods... This may be less so in stock markets but is often true in commodity trades. However... there are games to be played, too. In certain markets the election of options occurs before delivery is required in a window when the trading may be suspended... This is, in part, one of the strategies employed by the Hunt's exercising out-of-the-money calls on silver when they knew the underlying contracts couldn't be filled!
    – Matthew
    Commented Apr 5, 2014 at 0:34

3 Answers 3


Investopedia states:

While early exercise is generally not advisable, because the time value inherent in the option premium is lost upon doing so, there are certain circumstances under which early exercise may be advantageous. For example, an investor may choose to exercise a call option that is deeply in-the-money (such an option will have negligible time value) just before the ex-dividend date of the underlying stock. This will enable the investor to capture the dividend paid by the underlying stock, which should more than offset the marginal time value lost due to early exercise.

So the question is how well do you see the time value factor here?

  • 1
    But note that for the dividend to be qualified, the buyer must hold the stock for the required period (60 days of the 121-day period around the dividend date). That is not a reason against doing it, just a follow-up consideration.
    – NL7
    Commented Apr 2, 2014 at 21:42

The crucial insight is that the alternative to early exercise of an American call is not necessarily to hold it to expiry, but to sell it. And selling it, at its value, is always better than exercising it.

Note that this holds only for options on assets that don't pay dividends.

Here's the proof, using Put-Call-Parity.

We know that at expiry T, we have (using a Call and a Put both struck at K):

C(T) - P(T) = S(T) - K

(if this is not clear to you, consider the case where S is less than, equal to, or greater than K at maturity, and go through each of them.)

If the stock S doesn't pay any dividends (and there is no cost of carry etc.), we can replicate both sides now at time 0; we just buy one call, sell one put (that gives us the left hand side), buy the stock, and borrow money so that at time T we have to repay K (that gives us the right hand side). That means that now, we only need to borrow df * K, where df is the discount factor, and is less than one (assuming the good old pre-2009 world where interest rates are positive). Thus:

C(0) - P(0) = S(0) - df * K.

Rearranging gives:

C(0) = S(0) - df * K + P(0).

That's the value of the call, if we sell it (or hold it). However, if we exercise, we only get:

C_ex = S(0) - K

Now, we see that C(0) > C_ex, because we subtract less (df*K < K), and add P(0).

  • Isn't option price always greater than its intrinsic value? Wouldn't this be an easier proof of the same fact? Commented Jul 29, 2015 at 12:15
  • @DmitriZaitsev: not necessarily. 1) consider a put, struck at 1000, say, expiring in 10 years, on a stock that has basically collapsed to 0. You could exercise now, and get 1000, or you could wait 10 years and then get 1000 (maybe). With positive rates, it would be advantageous to exercise now. (Try the above argument, solving for P(0) instead, and you'll see). Basically, time value is positive, yes, but intrinsic value is discounted, while immediate exercise isn't. 2) With dividends, you might even want to exercise a call early.
    – Fab
    Commented Dec 16, 2015 at 18:22

For a deep in the money, it almost makes no difference because the intrinsic value, the price of the option, is seldom far above the liquidation value, the price of the underlying less the strike price.

For an at the money, ceteris paribus, an early exercise would immediately cut the value of the option to 0; however, life is not so simple as JB King has shown.

Purely theoretically, for an at or near the money option, an early exercise will be an instantaneous cost because the value after exercise is less than the previously trading or implied option price.

  • Can the intrinsic value be above the liquidation value? Commented Jul 29, 2015 at 12:16

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .