Many seniors have paid off their mortgages and car loans and haven't needed to borrow money in years, hence have no current credit score. Senior wants to downsize home but there is nothing suitable on the market, so he wants to have a small house built. Equity in current house will cover the cost of the new house. Current house can be expected to sell quickly in this market. He is debt free. Has some savings but not enough to build a new house. He has reliable income---still working and receives social security. His previous credit history consists of a mortgage and a car loan, no bad marks. He has never had a credit card. What is the best way for him to finance building a new home while still living in his current home?

  • 2
    Specifying the country may help... in some, you may be able to use the property as collateral for a loan: essentially a form of mortgage.
    – TripeHound
    Apr 24 at 12:24
  • 1
    United States. Note that a central issue is qualifying for a loan with no recent credit history (credit score of zero).
    – Eggy
    Apr 24 at 12:48
  • Not even a credit card? Wow....
    – littleadv
    Apr 24 at 22:30

3 Answers 3


Talk to a local bank or credit union about getting a Home Equity Line of Credit (HELOC). With a paid-off home it should be no trouble to get a loan even with an unusual credit history. The loan will be more than secured by the home, and if they know the plan is to sell the current home they will be much less worried about default.

Another option would be to get a Construction Loan for the new house. If their income can safely make the payments, then the loan should also be secured by the home under construction. If their income cannot cover the payments, though, this might be a tougher option.

Don't take an initial "no" as complete failure - keep trying banks until you find one that will work with you (and let them know you're shopping around so you have some leverage). Local banks tend to be more flexible with unusual situations and credit histories than large national banks, which rely much more on rigid formulas for small consumer loans.

  • 1
    Construction loans generally require a good credit score and 10-20% down, so it doesn't seem to solve the issue. Construction loans may be harder to get than mortgages because there's a lot of moving parts in building a home and if things go wrong, the bank gets stuck with a difficult to sell half-built home.
    – user71659
    Apr 24 at 20:48
  • 1
    @user71659 Maybe at national banks where the approval process is more rigid. If you go to a local bank and say "I have a paid off home and want a construction loan that I will pay off when I sell that home" they might be more flexible. They might prefer to use a HELOC instead but it's worth asking at least.
    – D Stanley
    Apr 24 at 21:34

haven't needed to borrow money in years, hence have no current credit score. ...

...He has never had a credit card.

The time since having a mortgage or a vehicle loan isn't what lead to a zero score, it was the lack of credit card.

When a person is young they start building their credit history and score by getting a credit card and using it wisely. They have a non-zero score before they apply for their first mortgage.

Getting a credit card from your bank or credit union can start to build the credit score again. It might take time.

Equity in current house will cover the cost of the new house. Current house can be expected to sell quickly in this market. He is debt free. Has some savings but not enough to build a new house.

One way is to sell the current home first, move into a small rental, and then make a final move into the new house. The proceeds from the sale of the current house are used to pay cash for the new house. Because of the uncertainty with the time to build the new house you may not have a good estimate of how many months you will need to rent.

While the lack of recent credit history might make some apartment mangers uneasy, you may have better luck with renting a condo or house from an individual, and offer to pay several months in advance.

Another option is to talk to your current bank, they may have options regarding getting a loan on the current home to fund the new home construction.


•Find a lender that offers "manual underwriting" (credit score based == automated underwriting).
•A HELOC may be a good option. (first mentioned in this answer)
•Due to the risk involved, a fixed income person shouldn't build.

Manual underwriting

Manual underwriting means looking at the whole financial picture of the borrower. Is the borrower like your senior - a person without a credit history because they do not borrow money? Or is the borrower a person who has always rented and regularly doesn't pay the rent, being kicked out of place after place.
Both of those examples may not have a credit score in the US. I think you'd agree that one of those people would be a bad choice to lend money to, but the other might be a good choice to lend money to.

Some reasons many entities do not allow their loan employees to do "manual underwriting":

  • Financial institutions can mitigate a lot of their risk (of making a bad loan) when they require that the borrower have a good credit score.

  • It takes far less training to teach someone to do a loan when the credit score is required to be present and larger than 680, 720, etc. (Less training --> less pay --> less overhead)

  • It takes less risk when there is a credit score, because the entity generating the score (FICO/Equifax/Trans Union/Experian/?) is already saying this person pays their bills which is a great start, right?
    Note: it isn't a guarantee that a higher score means you are in better financial shape - as an example a few years ago my credit score dropped 20+ points when I closed a credit card with a high limit. I'm arguably in a better financial position after closing that card because I have less credit now (fewer avenues to get in trouble). There's a good reason for the drop - but it is too far outside the scope of this question, and can be found elsewhere.

  • It reduces the chance of fraud when the loan engine can automatically reject loans below a certain score (the lender's employee/agent can't commit fraud by forcing through a loan to a friend/relative by doctoring paperwork, because an internal computer will override and deny the loan)

Many banks will do this if you can talk to the right person.
There are entities that can help you secure a loan with manual underwriting, I have used one of them and I had a great experience (note that I did not need manual) but I don't thing we're allowed to recommend here.

I expect his best bet is a credit union. Many allow manual underwriting.
Some of them are actually non-profit entities and will make 'bad loans' as defined by 'a loan other institutions would not make'. I am not talking about 'bad loan' in sense that the person cannot repay it. I mean bad in the sense that - just for example - if a person had a streak of hard times/bad luck the past few years (job loss or supporting a spouse/parent in bad health caused the person to pay for treatments, instead of paying their own bills on time for example) but that situation no longer applies, and they've otherwise shown a history of being financially responsible.
Interestingly, a number of credit unions experienced less than half of the average default rate for home loans in the 2009 timeframe (2009 was a very bad time period for defaults).

Credit unions have criteria for membership, and if that isn't possible I expect a HELOC would be his best bet for a loan.


HELOC == Home Equity Line Of Credit
This is a loan against the current property's value. The amount available will generally be available as a percentage of less than 100%.
If the paid for home appraises for $200k and the institution allows 80% Loan To Value (LTV), then he would have up to $160k (80% of 200k) that could be borrowed to build the new home.

Note that a HELOC may also require a certain credit score to get a good rate, which is why I listed it second.
Perhaps, with no credit score, some entities that would not offer a home construction loan may offer a HELOC but maybe they would adjust to 60% LTV and loan at a higher interest rate. He will have to shop.

Note that he will probably have to make payments on the HELOC while the current home is being built. If you can't make the payments you risk losing both properties.
Historically, there were loan types in the US that allowed no payments but had a 'balloon payment' at the end of the loan - these have largely disappeared due to US Federal regulations put in place after the 2009 financial crisis.


Consider selling the home he is in, storing most of his stuff, and living in an apartment while the home is built, or while looking for a new home that may come on the market and meet his needs.


Financially -
He should investigate both a HELOC and any available credit union options. I expect a straight loan with both properties as collateral would be the lowest interest rate, but research needs to be done for his specific case.
Even though you didn't ask, I think he should buy instead of build (see the next point).

Building a home -
I've heard so many stories about a person failing when trying to be their own general contractor, that I do not recommend this option. I've also heard horror stories about general contractors not finishing and going bankrupt.
We are talking about a senior on a fixed income with fixed assets - this seems too risky to me.
I saw a High School friend of mine do this. He had a home that was 'preconstructed' (or some such term) and then assembled on land he inherited (given before his death as his inheritance, but I digress).
He had a fixed price for the two-story home itself, which sounded great.
However, the water and sewage systems went way over budget, and he was on the hook for overruns on those. Power cost thousands to run instead of the few hundred he was quoted from the power company. (Maybe his fault for not getting it in writing)
None of those are optional - so he ended up needing 110% of the value of the home to buy it. Unfortunately, the fixed cost 'preconstructed' house was, to the bank, more like a mobile on a foundation, than it was like a traditional house and so the interest rate was higher.
My friend was in his 30's and could recover through bankruptcy.
(But the the 'family land' he was deeded is now occupied by a non-family member; he was regularly reminded of that until his parents passed.)
Someone who is 65+ making mistakes like those may never recover, transitioning from financially independent, to financially dependent.

Selling a home -

Current house can be expected to sell quickly in this market.

Right... but remember it has to still be good time to sell when it is time to sell his home - and that situation can change quickly. (I know that normally it doesn't change quickly... but it did exactly that in 2009. Financial institutions remember that fact.)

Additional Resource -
It sounds like your senior should be told about Dave Ramsey and his crew - they are big on 'no debt'. Ramsey Solutions provides free financial advice through their website, podcasts, radio show, and other outlets. There is a lot more relevant mortgage related content which goes into more depth than my answer on that site.
A good starting point is this article which explains the mortgage underwriting process. It also contains a list of what you will have to provide for manually underwriting... this answer is way to long already for me to type that... just follow the link (it is not an affiliate link; I'm not associated with them). Ramsey solutions does have advertisers, but nothing is required to get the information - not even an email address.

  • 1
    Not sure why this was downvoted. It's outside my ability to decide if it's good or bad.
    – Joshua
    Apr 25 at 19:45
  • Thank you for this very thorough answer! Extremely helpful. To clarify, the person has been searching for a house for several years and concluded there is nothing on the market. The type of house he is looking for---quite small and modern---doesn't exist in his region. It doesn't make sense to wait any longer to make a move, with the risk that the market could fall and he would lose value on his house.
    – Eggy
    Apr 26 at 11:43
  • 1
    Sounds like my "Alternative" section is the way to go. Concern over losing value would support selling now and then building without a loan. Apr 26 at 16:27
  • 1
    "Concern over losing value would support selling now and then building without a loan." Well stated, thank you. Given the person's modest savings and income, a primary goal is to not spend any money on apartment rent. RE stars, your answer is the most helpful but I didn't want to discount the other answers or shut off the discussion.
    – Eggy
    Apr 26 at 18:29
  • 1
    I actually did upvote your answer, which raised it from -1 to 0. I will accept it eventually, but I'd like to see if there are any more ideas. I greatly appreciate the time you took to formulate a comprehensive answer!
    – Eggy
    Apr 27 at 1:29

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .