1

I am interested in MSCI World Index and was comparing several ETFs. I can understand that performance of ETF itself can be slightly different but how is possible that there is difference in benchmark performance?

There is more:

How can I even find benchmark index? I suppose it should be net MSCI World Index (USD). Only way I can explain Invesco 2021 performance is that they decided to show the performance in EUR instead of USD. But how I can trust these documents then? And how ETF with size of 3 billion dollars cannot get even basic KIID required by law right?

I am not sure even how I should check performance myself should it be 1/1 (or first trading day) to 31/12 or 1/1 to 1/1 and open or close price?

TL;DR:

  • How is it possible for ETF benchmark performance to be different?
  • How can performance differ by 10% in a year?
  • Are KIIDs reliable source of information?
4
  • 1
    Bernhard Dobler: Thanks, that is my theory as well, I wrote "Only way I can explain Invesco 2021 performance is that they decided to show the performance in EUR instead of USD.". That would mean they have it wrong in KIID where it is supposed to be in USD.
    – Sekory
    Commented Sep 1, 2022 at 7:29
  • I looked into the various PDF downloads on justetf. There's a download Factsheet (DE). Interestingly both funds agree on the 21.82 % for the year 2021. Commented Sep 1, 2022 at 22:23
  • Really? I don't see that for Invesco MSCI World UCITS ETF link there is 31.1% for Xtrackers MSCI World UCITS ETF link there is 21.9%
    – Sekory
    Commented Sep 2, 2022 at 7:24

1 Answer 1

1

How is it possible for ETF benchmark performance to be different?

There is more than one index that is called MSCI World. One big difference is the treatment of dividends, one can either completely ignore them, completely reinvest them (total return index) or something in the middle as dividends typically will be taxed (e.g. net total return). The other big difference is currency. Recently the exchange rate between euro and USD had rather big changes.

How can performance differ by 10% in a year?

My suspect here would be currency. Dividends for a general index are more in the magnitude of 2%, so they cannot account for 10% change

Are KIIDs reliable source of information?

KIIDs are legally required investor documentation. Therefore incorrect information is not acceptable. Of course, they are made by humans and whenever there are humans involved, there will be an error sooner or later.

1
  • Thank you for answer, I am grateful for any answer but this one is a bit too generic for me. All linked ETF are accumulative, so there cannot be difference in having or not having dividends. They have different domicile, but it doesn't explain why there is difference in just one year. 10% difference: You just write again my suspicion and the thing is that both ETFs are in USD. About KIIDs, thanks but I still don't know why there are these discrepancies.
    – Sekory
    Commented Sep 2, 2022 at 7:34

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .