Why would a company issue rights instead of warrants (and vice versa)?

Why would a trader or investor buy/sell rights instead of warrants or options (i.e. which situations make one of these more desirable than the other)?

1 Answer 1


A stock warrant is issued by the company whereas options are issued by the CBOE (USA).

Rights tend to have a very short expiration (weeks).

Options tend to have a shorter expiration than warrants (depends on the warrant's expiration and if the stock offers LEAPS).

Warrants can have very long expirations, as much as 5+ years.

Exercise of warrants causes dilution because the company issues new stock. Exercise of an option results in the transfer of existing shares between counterparties.

At issuance, the strike price of a right tends to be closer to share price and may be in-the-money. For warrants, it's typically out-of-the money.

  • Thank you! Where do the shares come from when exercising rights/is this dilutive as well? Apr 2 at 23:31
  • While I have owned rights a good number of times via IPOs, I don't know the answer (didn't look at the details). I have read that they are non-dilutive but they can be dilutive so I'd guess that it depends on the terms of the rights. Perhaps a google search might turn up and answer. Apr 3 at 4:12

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.