I am aware that negative yield bonds are possible (e.g. by selling a zero coupon bond at a price greater than par value). Are negative coupon bonds possible? I have not found any real-life examples of bonds that have a negative coupon, so I am wondering why they don't exist.

  • 2
    What woud be the advantage over "conventional" negative yield bonds? To me this just sounds like a lot more hassle because you have to track the coupons and get the negative interest later (as the bond issuer).
    – Manziel
    Commented Apr 20, 2021 at 9:35
  • A savings account with a monthly fee isn't much different than a negative yield bond.
    – quid
    Commented May 18, 2021 at 17:16

3 Answers 3


The simplest explanation is that they don't exist because there's no need/demand for it.

I can't think of any advantages over negative-yield bonds (they don't have to be zero coupon, as long as the price is high enough to exceed the principal + coupons) but there is a significant disadvantage: the issuer would need to track and collect all the coupon payments it's owed, which shifts some of the counterparty risk from the issuer to the bearer.

  • 2
    The "counterparty risk" is one thing, but the mere logistics of tracking the bondholders and collecting from them WOULD be the ultimate nightmare! (grin)
    – RiverNet
    Commented Apr 20, 2021 at 14:15
  • @SRiverNet I agree but I guess that could be done electronically/centrally, if there were a use for it.
    – 0xFEE1DEAD
    Commented Apr 20, 2021 at 17:52
  • 2
    True. You know, I wouldn't mind finding a way to charge people interest for loaning ME money, though! (laugh)
    – RiverNet
    Commented Apr 20, 2021 at 17:53

The rule is, no, negative coupons don't exist.

For the exception to the rule, Reuters found a couple of cases in history where bondholders paid a coupon:


Data from IFR shows a range of issuers including cities, banks and companies have bonds with theoretical negative coupons.

These are unlikely to ever be imposed, though, as market infrastructure is not set up to collect coupon payments from multiple investors to an issuer.

Europe’s main clearing houses, Euroclear and Clearstream, which settle bond deals in the region, have said they will not accept any debt which has a fixed negative interest rate.

On floating rate notes, they said negative coupons have usually paid zero because the issuer set a floor, chose not to collect due to the burden, or the bond terms did not allow for a payment to be made.

Matthew Hartley, a capital markets partner at lawyers Allen & Overy, said bond terms would not normally allow cash to flow from investors to an issuer.

“It is very difficult to enforce against what is in theory an anonymous mass of bondholders,” Hartley said.

This has still created uncertainty among investors though. Allen & Overy said it has helped more issuers insert explicit terms in bond documents flooring coupon rates at zero in recent years.


There are some examples where negative coupons were paid.

Euroclear said it has on a few occasions collected coupon payments due from investors to issuers on short-term French commercial paper known as titres de creances negociables (TCNs). This paper is usually only held by a couple of investors so payments are easier to collect.

Going back 14 years, Warren Buffett’s Berkshire Hathaway issued a bond with an effective negative coupon in 2002. This was sold with a warrant to buy Berkshire shares, the net effect of which was investors paid more in interest than they received.

  • 1
    Maybe you could quote/summarize the main points of the article
    – 0xFEE1DEAD
    Commented Apr 20, 2021 at 18:04
  • 1
    At some point, the URL will be broken and this answer will be nearly useless. Commented Apr 22, 2021 at 1:24

Yes, but they're annuities, so they aren't "true" negative coupon bonds.

In August 2019 the 3rd biggest Danish bank Jyske Bank issued a series of 10 year mortgage bonds with a -0.5% coupon. This had to happen since fixed rate mortgage bonds have to be issued below par according to Danish law. But since the negative coupon is just subtracted from the principal payments, the payments are still going to the bondholders every quarter.

See the following article for more information: http://news.coveredbondreport.com/2019/08/annuity-structure-allows-jyske-negative-coupon-milestone/

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .