Non-resident aliens do not have to pay capital gains tax for stocks, but they have to pay a 30% tax on cash dividends (source). Can they avoid this tax by selling the stock before the ex-dividend date and buying it back on the ex-dividend date? Since the price of the stock will fall by the amount of the cash dividend, they would have produced a homemade dividend when they repurchase the stock at a lower price on the ex-dividend date. Is this method allowed?

There is one problem I can see: there is no guarantee that they would be able to repurchase the stock at a lower price on the ex-dividend date. How can they get around this problem? Can they use options to solve this problem?

(Assume that the non-resident alien lives in a tax-free jurisdiction that has no applicable tax treaties with the US.)


In absence of tax in the jurisdiction of the non-resident alien, the most efficient way is synthetic long stock position with options (Long Call, Short Put, Long Treasury), or long Single Stock Futures/CFD with Long Treasury.

If the bet is on Index instead of single stock, the best way is Index futures with Long Treasury, followed by Ireland-domiciled ETF (reduces dividend withholding to 15% but does not eliminate).

As a side note, the interest of US Treasury is exempt from withholding tax (26 U.S. Code § 871(h)) and the principal is exempt from estate tax (26 U.S. Code § 2105 (b)(3)).

Theoretically according to Dividend Irrelevance Theory, selling and rebuying stock around Ex-Dividend should work on average and in the long run, but it is best that you backtest different stock under different trend.

| improve this answer | |
  • Will the synthetic long stock position lose a lot of value due to time decay? If the investment horizon is 5 to 10 years, will the cost of rollovers be excessive? – Flux Sep 10 at 5:23
  • How does time decay fit into the put-call parity? Time decay hurts your in long call, but benefits you in short put. Options always have those huge bid ask spread and a mid price execution for both the call and put would be ideal. Yes the cost of rollover is much higher than futures. – base64 Sep 10 at 6:10

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.