0

Investing noob here.

TOPS stock (TOP Ships Inc) on the NASDAQ is currently trading at $0.11 per share but it used to be billions per share.

Did they continuously raise so much capital that investors kept getting diluted? Is this a result of stock splitting? I really cannot fathom that stock's early valuation.

Could such a monumental plunge happen to current high value stocks such as Amazon, Tesla, or BRK.A?

7
  • 2
    Interesting that there is pretty much zero information about that company on the web which is not related to their stock. Looks like an investment scam.
    – Philipp
    Jul 9 '20 at 18:58
  • googling finds this: reddit.com/r/investing/comments/g0q5kh/…
    – Vicky
    Jul 9 '20 at 19:11
  • 2
    @Philipp Their website (topships.org) is one of the most impressive scam websites I've ever seen. They list their management team, contact numbers, and everything. I guess if a middle-man is raking in millions then spending some dough on the site is a worthwhile investment. Seems like a pure gambling penny stock; more volatile than SPXS and SPXL.
    – MonkeyZeus
    Jul 9 '20 at 19:20
  • Note that the millions or billions per share you currently see on historical price charts represent split-adjusted prices. The (old) shares of TOPS have probably never traded on NASDAQ at millions or billions per share.
    – Flux
    Jul 10 '20 at 5:53
  • 1
    @MonkeyZeus - Splits are reflected on all historical data. However, an occasional charting site gives you the option to look at unadjusted data. Jul 10 '20 at 18:08
7

It's even worse than you think. The high price for TOPS in 2004 was $173,502,005,248

The reason for this absurd price is that TOPS has had many, many reverse splits. Here are the ones since 2008:

  • 03/20/2008 1 for 3
  • 06/24/2011 1 for 10
  • 04/21/2014 1 for 7
  • 02/22/2016 1 for 10
  • 05/11/2017 1 for 20
  • 06/23/2017 1 for 15
  • 08/03/2017 1 for 30
  • 10/06/2017 1 for 2
  • 03/26/2018 1 for 10
  • 08/22/2019 1 for 20

If you hypothetically owned 7,560,000,000 shares at the outset, after all of these reverse splits, you'd own one share.

10
  • Wow, nice! May I ask where you found this data?
    – MonkeyZeus
    Jul 10 '20 at 16:11
  • So is this stock nothing more than a scheme to make amateur traders think the stock is skyrocketing so people jump on the bandwagon while the string-pullers sell off?
    – MonkeyZeus
    Jul 10 '20 at 16:14
  • Having seen this many times over the years, I knew that the cause was reverse splits. Then, it was just a matter of googling "TOPS reverse split history". The first one on the list showed 9 splits. It's not a scheme at all. It's just a function of how data is adjusted when stock splits occur. Jul 10 '20 at 16:18
  • Why is it that we have to rely on a website like splithistory.com for this data? Wouldn't the SEC have some sort of formal history data? Or maybe a major broker such as Fidelity?
    – MonkeyZeus
    Jul 10 '20 at 16:25
  • 1
    And the reason for the absurd price is that before 2018 the company only had a few thousand shares (I can't find the exact numbers). So "owning 756 million shares at the outset" would not be possible; you would have needed to own the entire company thousands of times over.
    – Brady Gilg
    Jul 10 '20 at 17:54

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.