2

I am living with my domestic partner and our child, and she contributes about twice what I do into our joint checking account from which all bills are paid. Can she file as head of household? I think she's checking all the right boxes:

  • unmarried, filing separately
  • claiming a dependent
  • effectively pays > 50% of household expenses

Does the joint account make this difficult to establish? This is not in a community property state, if that matters.

Edit: I'm wondering what kind of documentation would be necessary in an audit. For example, it seems possible that if our household expenses are low enough that I could pay >50% of them, as long as her income was going toward something else.

  • How is this different than if you contributed 2x as much as her? – RonJohn Jan 18 at 21:08
  • @RonJohn, I'm not sure what your question means. Sorry. If I contributed 2x as much as her I would not expect she could file as head of household unless we were able to show that she paid all of our bills and more than 3/4 of my income went to non-household expenses. But I think I'm missing something. :) – jflournoy Jan 21 at 19:15
  • (This comment presumes that you're a man. If you're not, then ignore it...) One word: patriarchy. If a guy contributed most of the money to running the household, he wouldn't bat an eye at claiming HOH status. – RonJohn Jan 21 at 20:11
  • I think I agree. I just really wanted to make sure the IRS isn't going to be weird about the documentation because I could imagine someone contributing <50% to a joint checking account claiming that they pay >50% of the bills. – jflournoy Jan 23 at 19:38
  • 1
    If they audit her, they'll ask for evidence. But... they do that during all audits. (And they don't audit many people.) – RonJohn Jan 23 at 19:49
6

Since money is fungible1, the joint account would make it easier to demonstrate that she pays more than half of the household expenses

That's because there's a 2:1 ratio going in, so there's a 2:1 ratio going out, even though which dollars "belong" to who was lost when they got combined.

1 able to replace or be replaced by another identical item; mutually interchangeable.

|improve this answer|||||

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.