I have been comparing mortgages on a banks website.

It appears that the term I choose does not affect the interest rate I am offered.

In this case the deals allow 10% overpayment per year without penalty.

In this case does it makes sense to go for a longer term so my compulsory repayments are less, then voluntarily overpay in the first 3-5 years (after which point I will most likely remortgage)? This then gives me the option to be paying less should I get into financial difficulty.

  • 10% of what? Of the remaining balance or of the payment amount?
    – D Stanley
    Oct 2, 2019 at 16:53
  • 8
    A location tag would be helpful. In the US, I'd be shocked if a 15-year mortgage didn't have a lower rate than a 30-year mortgage (not a huge difference but when rates are this low, small absolute differences are relatively large relative differences). And I'd be surprised if you found a mortgage with prepayment penalties offered due to post-2008 regulatory changes-- it certainly wouldn't be common Oct 2, 2019 at 18:18
  • that would be 10% of the outstanding balance
    – Dilitante
    Oct 7, 2019 at 14:53
  • 1
    @JustinCave this is in the UK; i got the rates through a banks own comparision feature for its products - i don't know if the actual rates offered after application may vary based on term
    – Dilitante
    Oct 7, 2019 at 14:55
  • @JustinCave - Rates in the UK (now that we have the location tag) tend to vary by loan-to-value (i.e. what percentage of the house's value is mortgage), but not by term. Dilitante - It's likely (based on my experience) to be 10% of the initial loan amount, rather than the outstanding balance; but I obviously won't guarantee that.
    – AndyT
    Oct 8, 2019 at 14:13

1 Answer 1


Yes if the interest rate is the same and overpayments are applied to principal then you can get a 30-year mortgage and pay it off as if it were a 15-year mortgage.

The risk is that you decide that rather than overpaying you'd rather buy a car, or go on vacation, etc. and you end up paying it over 30 years anyways. A shorter term forces you to pay it off sooner rather than relying on personal discipline.

  • 2
    Just a alternative perspective, what D Stanley here calls a 'risk', I would call a 'feature'. I like that the amount required each month is lower, with a plan to overpay each month so that should an unexpected expense come up, I have the flexibility to just make that lower minimum. As noted above, this does require discipline. Oct 3, 2019 at 19:33
  • @R.Hamilton I agree, for that exact reason.
    – RonJohn
    Oct 7, 2019 at 15:43

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.