When generating fake United States credit card numbers, I know that any random number that passes the Luhn algorithm would work, but then I run the risk, even if small, of generating a CCN in current use.

Has the American Banking Association set aside a range of bank identifier numbers specifically for sample numbers? Does any standard range exist?

This would be similar to the example.com domains, the TEST-NET-1, TEST-NET-2, TEST-NET-3 IP addresses, or the (xxx) 555-01xx telephone range.

I guess I could generate numbers that would fail the Luhn check, but would prefer to generate numbers that pass it.


I don't have a definitive list, but a quick search yielded lots of results.

A small selection of numbers:

  • VISA: 4111 1111 1111 1111

  • MasterCard: 5555 5555 5555 4444

  • Discover: 6011 6011 6011 6611

  • AmEx: 3782 8224 6310 005

These numbers all pass the Luhn algorithm.

I haven't seen any standard range of "test" numbers. However, the first 6 digits of a credit card number are the Issuer Identification Number (IIN) and are assigned to individual card issuers. It is likely that the IIN in the test numbers above are unused. I would guess, for example, that you could use any 16 digit number beginning with "411111" and it would be safe to use.

  • 1
    Yes, those are individual numbers that pass Luhn, but I'm curious about number ranges, so I can generate random numbers in that range. – Aaron Toponce Nov 30 '18 at 4:37
  • 1
    @AaronToponce I've added a thought to my answer about number ranges, but it is just speculation on my part. I don't have a source. – Ben Miller - Remember Monica Nov 30 '18 at 5:16
  • Yeah. It's a standard I'm looking for, either set aside by the ABA, or an ANSI or ISO standard, that says something like: "xYYY YYxx xxxx xxxx" are reserved sample ranges for YYYY1 through YY999", or something similar. – Aaron Toponce Nov 30 '18 at 5:38
  • 2
    Some merchant gateways I've seen support a bunch of test card numbers, where each one fails for a specified reason. But there isn't any One True Range Of Example Card Numbers that I've ever heard of, and for various reasons, such a range wouldn't be useful for much. One of those reasons: fake numbers don't even need to pass a Luhn check, so 90% of the range already works for 555-like purposes. – cHao Nov 30 '18 at 14:34

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.