Skip to main content
28 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Oct 19, 2017 at 0:31 answer added cornbread timeline score: 1
Oct 17, 2017 at 3:54 vote accept NeedAdvice
Oct 11, 2017 at 23:16 review Suggested edits
Oct 12, 2017 at 10:42
Oct 11, 2017 at 3:45 comment added farnsy @NeedAdvice If your question is in the context of someone who cannot deduct traditional IRA contributions, then we are talking about a backdoor Roth situation and you should describe it as such. In that case #3 is not true. The tax benefits when compared with a brokerage account should be fairly obvious. You don't have to pay tax on the dividends or capital gains if you use it for retirement or other qualified expenses (like a first home or education).
Oct 11, 2017 at 1:46 comment added NeedAdvice @farnsy I am afraid, I will have to disagree with you. I've added documentation links from IRS. You will see that I am right. I don't think 72k a year qualifies as a very high earner.
Oct 11, 2017 at 1:45 answer added Harper - Reinstate Monica timeline score: 1
Oct 11, 2017 at 1:44 history edited NeedAdvice CC BY-SA 3.0
provided documentation.
Oct 11, 2017 at 1:43 comment added NeedAdvice @David and others... #1 is absolutely true. Per rules defined on the IRS site, if you are covered by a retirement plan and make more than 72k, you cannot deduct your contributions, e.g. they are taxed. If you are NOT covered by a retirement plan at work, then you can deduct contributions.
Oct 10, 2017 at 5:41 comment added farnsy True. But I don't think a backdoor Roth qualifies as a "Traditional IRA" for the purposes of this question. That's my reading, anyway. #2 holds only if the money is in a Roth at the time it is withdrawn.
Oct 10, 2017 at 5:25 comment added Ben Voigt @farnsy: There can be post-tax money in a traditional IRA (#1) and when that happens, the earnings are taxed at withdrawal (#3) but the contributions aren't (#2). "backdoor" Roth contributions relied on this\
Oct 9, 2017 at 23:48 comment added farnsy Your understanding of how IRAs work is completely wrong. Unless you are a very high earner, #1 is incorrect. #2 is always incorrect.
Oct 9, 2017 at 23:19 comment added Wes Sayeed #1 is incorrect. You get a refund on the taxes paid on IRA contributions. But you have to file for them on your taxes because they are self-directed (as opposed to an employer 401(k) which is already pre-tax, so you get no refund on that).
Oct 9, 2017 at 20:57 answer added Beanluc timeline score: 2
S Oct 9, 2017 at 20:04 history suggested stannius CC BY-SA 3.0
Clarify title
Oct 9, 2017 at 19:35 answer added louis nardozi timeline score: -2
Oct 9, 2017 at 18:30 answer added EJoshuaS - Stand with Ukraine timeline score: 1
Oct 9, 2017 at 18:27 review Suggested edits
S Oct 9, 2017 at 20:04
Oct 9, 2017 at 17:18 comment added David To my knowledge, #1 is incorrect. Contributions to a Roth IRA are taxed. Contributions to a Traditional IRA are not taxed, regardless of 401K use, presuming that you're under the income limits.
Oct 9, 2017 at 15:24 answer added PGnome timeline score: 9
Oct 9, 2017 at 14:40 history tweeted twitter.com/StackFinance/status/917399379866214401
Oct 9, 2017 at 7:11 history edited Dheer
edited tags
Oct 9, 2017 at 6:47 answer added RonJohn timeline score: 7
Oct 9, 2017 at 6:29 answer added user102008 timeline score: 6
Oct 9, 2017 at 1:42 answer added Brythan timeline score: 5
Oct 9, 2017 at 1:37 answer added JTP - Apologise to Monica timeline score: 7
Oct 9, 2017 at 1:04 history edited NeedAdvice CC BY-SA 3.0
added 16 characters in body
Oct 9, 2017 at 0:57 answer added CQM timeline score: 21
Oct 9, 2017 at 0:46 history asked NeedAdvice CC BY-SA 3.0