Timeline for Why would a public company not initiate secondary stock offerings more often?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
5 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 6, 2019 at 20:08 | history | edited | Bob Baerker | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
spelling
|
| Dec 20, 2016 at 23:10 | comment | added | Joe | @BenMiller Fair enough, edited (though I tend to think that there is a transaction cost that, in the short term, means you do reduce your actual ownership stake, despite of course the hope that you will increase it with growth). | |
| Dec 20, 2016 at 23:09 | history | edited | Joe | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 1 character in body
|
| Dec 20, 2016 at 23:05 | comment | added | Ben Miller | Issuing new shares isn't quite the same as selling a portion of your ownership. True, your percentage of ownership goes down, but the capital raised by the new shares goes directly to the company, increasing the size of the pie. | |
| Dec 20, 2016 at 22:59 | history | answered | Joe | CC BY-SA 3.0 |