Personal Finance & Money Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people who want to be financially literate. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Given the following situation:

  • an employer-offered "Simple IRA" run by a major brokerage with 1% gross pay matching;
  • No near-future feasible opportunity to invest the Simple IRA contribution in a no-load index fund because of high minimums;
  • the option of buying A or C shares of virtually any mutual fund available, so long as it isn't no-load;
  • a transaction fee of $50 per ten shares on stocks, including ETFs; and no option to go somewhere other than the specific brokerage without forgoing the 1% matching,

What is the optimal strategy in this situation for someone who ideally would invest in a passive index fund like Vanguard's VFINX with minimal frictional costs?

  • ETFs, even though they have the relatively high transaction fee? If so, how should the transactions be spaced so as to minimize the frictional costs?
  • A mutual fund with a load of some sort, even though they will have fees of their own and (AFAIK) have poorer performance than an index fund and generally are not passive?
  • Forgo the matching and just save a certain percentage of income in an index fund privately?
  • Some other strategy altogether?

Edit: generalized the question, took out the explanation of A and C shares (someone please let me know if they are not standardized and thus the brokerage might have a unique fee structure for them that would change the optimal strategy). Not looking for specific buy/sell recommendations, e.g. I just want something as close to index funds like VFINX or VOO as possible. If it turns out the best strategy is a brokerage-exclusive discount on iShares' IVV, that works just as well. Thanks for all the responses so far.

share|improve this question
are you sure you have to pay the loads? My Mom had a ML 401k and the load was waived inside the 401k (as it should be since there's no salesperson to get the commission), even though it was a bunch of load funds. The funds still had high expenses of course. – Havoc P Apr 27 '11 at 21:27
I commend you on writing a very detailed question. Please note, though, that specific buy/sell recommendations are off-topic for this site. Please consult the FAQ using the link to the left of the search box at the top of the page. – George Marian Apr 27 '11 at 21:37
@Jordan Can you make your question a bit more generic so it might help other people in similar situations? – Michael Pryor Apr 27 '11 at 22:33
Complete side note: Only 1%? More. – C. Ross Apr 28 '11 at 12:23
@C. Ross: If 1% is what it takes to get the full company match, do not put any more money than you have to into what sounds like a plan with excessive fees. Much better to put extra money into an outside/independent IRA where there aren't such crazy fees. – bstpierre Apr 28 '11 at 14:44
up vote 2 down vote accepted

The $50 fee is crazy. I'd not miss the match, despite the load fund fees. If you put in $500 and get $500 match, a 5% fee won't kill you. But that's all I'd put in. Invest outside that IRA, as much as you can. Sorry, 1% is pretty low, sorry they don't have a low cost 401(k).

share|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.