Tell me more ×
Personal Finance & Money Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people who want to be financially literate. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Can someone please explain the meaning of 'shorting' a stock with an example?

share|improve this question
Could anyone elaborate on the etymology of the words. What is the metaphore behind "short position" and "long position"? Is "long position" meaning you are holding the stocks for a long time, expecting long growth? – dhill Nov 17 '11 at 17:53

2 Answers

up vote 14 down vote accepted

This is a gross simplification as there are a few different ways to do this. The principle overall is the same though.

To short a stock, you borrow X shares from a third party and sell them at the current price. You now owe the lender X shares but have the proceeds from the sale. If the share price falls you can buy back those shares at the new lower price, return them to the lender and pocket the difference.

The risk comes when the share price goes the other way, you now owe the lender the new value of the shares, so have to find some way to cover the difference. This happened a while back when Porsche made a fortune buying shares in Volkswagen from short sellers, and the price unexpectedly rose.

share|improve this answer

Rich's answer captures the basic essence of short selling with example.

I'd like to add these additional points:

  • You typically need a specially-privileged brokerage account to perform short selling. If you didn't request short selling when you opened your account, odds are good you don't have it, and that's good because it's not something most people should ever consider doing. Short selling is an advanced trading strategy. Be sure you truly grok selling short before doing it.

  • Consider that when buying stock (a.k.a. going long or taking a long position, in contrast to short) then your potential loss as a buyer is limited (i.e. stock goes to zero) and your potential gain unlimited (stock keeps going up, if you're lucky!)

    Whereas, with short selling, it's reversed: Your loss can be unlimited (stock keeps going up, if you're unlucky!) and your potential gain is limited (i.e. stock goes to zero.)

  • The proceeds you receive from a short sale – and then some – need to stay in your account to offset the short position. Brokers require this. Typically, margin equivalent to 150% the market value of the shares sold short must be maintained in the account while the short position is open.

  • The owner of the borrowed shares is still expecting his dividends, if any. You are responsible for covering the cost of those dividends out of your own pocket.

  • To close or cover your short position, you initiate a buy to cover. This is simply a buy order with the intention that it will close out your matching short position.

  • You may be forced to cover your short position before you want to and when it is to your disadvantage! Even if you have sufficient margin available to cover your short, there are cases when lenders need their shares back. If too many short sellers are forced to close out positions at the same time, they push up demand for the stock, increasing price and deepening their losses. When this happens, it's called a short squeeze.

  • In the eyes of the public who mostly go long buying stock, short sellers are often reviled. However, some people and many short sellers believe they are providing balance to the market and preventing it sometimes from getting ahead of itself.

  • [Disambiguation: A short sale in the stock market is not related to the real estate concept of a short sale, which is when a property owner sells his property for less than he owes the bank.]

Additional references:

share|improve this answer
1  
@Chris Are there any costs involved with short selling? – gyurisc Mar 24 '10 at 5:30
Similar commission as when selling a stock you own. Also, as mentioned, if it's a dividend paying stock you must pay the dividend to the guy who lent you his stock to short. – JoeTaxpayer Nov 7 '10 at 1:45
1  
@joetaxpayer : Wouldn't the guy also charge a fee for lending you the stock? – Joe.E Jun 21 '11 at 5:10
@Joe E - only for shares that are tough to short. There's a small number of shares that are either so closely held or highly shorted already, that brokers will pay a monthly fee to the guy they borrow from, in some cases far higher than a dividend. – JoeTaxpayer Jun 21 '11 at 11:05
@JoeTaxpayer Excellent clarifications! The fee for borrowing the stock is often what makes a short selling strategy uneconomic. Often the best stocks to short for arbitrage set-up's cost too much to borrow. – Feral Oink Oct 10 '11 at 9:57

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.