Take the 2-minute tour ×
Personal Finance & Money Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people who want to be financially literate. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Let's say every month I transfer $559, which is about 3 shares of VOO. The commission from Fidelity is $7.95, which is about 1.42%. Is it worth doing that, or better, every other month buy worth of $1118 of VOO and pay the same $7.95 commission?

Is there a general guideline for buying a certain amount of an ETF when paying a commission?

share|improve this question

2 Answers 2

Neither. For frequent small purchases, use an indexed mutual fund. The benefit is no commission, and the ability to invest the exact amount you wish each month.

share|improve this answer
    
IVV trades commission free at Fidelity. –  CodeCrack Feb 20 at 0:16
1  
Assuming you can find one with expense ratios as low as ETFs while meeting the minimum investment requirements. –  Craig W Feb 20 at 0:20
1  
VFIAX .05% low enough? Me? I'll stick with VIIIX .02% or to put into perspective $200 per $million per year –  JoeTaxpayer Feb 20 at 0:26
1  
As long as the OP doesn't mind switching brokerages to Vanguard, and has the $10,000 minimum investment for VFIAX, or $200 million minimum investment for VIIIX. –  Craig W Feb 20 at 0:32
    
I missed the min on the first fund. The second is offered through 401(K) providers. –  JoeTaxpayer Feb 20 at 0:45

Likely a far better alternative than buying VOO monthly or every two months would be to buy IVV, the iShares S&P 500 ETF, so very similar to VOO but with a slightly higher expense ratio of 0.07% versus 0.05%. It trades commission free at Fidelity so you can buy as often as practical. Unless you are buying a very large number of shares at once (tens of thousands of dollars worth, I would guess), and keeping them for several years, I doubt that 0.02% expense ratio difference will outweigh the $7.95 commission.

share|improve this answer
1  
I disagree. 0.01 in expense ratio will cover the 7.95 commission in about a year and a quarter at this amount. So unless the OP plans on holding for less than 2.5 years, VOO makes more sense, even if buying for $660/month and selling each position separately. –  littleadv Feb 19 at 23:51
    
Can you break down the numbers? I might be calculating the expense ratio wrong but it seems like… VOO expense ratio is 0.05% btw and IVV is 0.07% Let's use 3 years as an example. Commission paid each month = 7.95 x 12 x 3 = $286.2 paid in commission in 3 years… Now the 0.02% expense ratio difference is.. 0.02% of 559 each month is 0.1118 x 12 = 1.3416 x 3 years = $4.0248 –  CodeCrack Feb 20 at 0:10
5  
@littleadv - .01% or as they say 1 basis point, is 1/100 of a percent, or $1 per $10,000 per year. There's a break even but it's a bit longer. –  JoeTaxpayer Feb 20 at 0:17
1  
@JoeTaxpayer oh right:) –  littleadv Feb 20 at 0:17

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.