Personal Finance & Money Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people who want to be financially literate. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

If I take a loan for 1.000,000 and try to pay it in five years, I'll have to pay approx 20000 as EMI. My uncle tells me to keep the tenure as 20 years (with interest rate at 10%), and my EMI will be just 7000. He says it's an advantage because due to the rate of inflation being about 7%, the value of this 7000 will be very less in 10 or 20 years time, and will be a much better option than trying to pay it off in 5 years. Is it really better?

[this is in India, where the house prices are rising]

share|improve this question
Welcome to SE, can you tell us what EMI is? Either in words or a link to a good definition. – JoeTaxpayer Feb 13 '13 at 16:45
Sorry. Added it to the question as a link. EMI is Equated Monthly Installment. – Nav Feb 13 '13 at 16:48
Actually, it's my own ignorance. And posters from outside the US help educate us. – JoeTaxpayer Feb 13 '13 at 18:13
I also want to know if I take loan for longer period and pay lump sum every year reducing the principal amount thus reducing the interest rather than higher EMI...which is more beneficial... – user18997 Jul 12 '14 at 10:27
up vote 6 down vote accepted

As a general principle if you are able to comfortably afford Rs20 K every month, with contingency, you should go ahead. The value of Rs 7000 may be less in later years, however it does not impact anything, the other consideration you need to make is if you can afford 20 K, then paying 7 K in interest will leave you with 13 K. Are you comfortable to make an investment of 13 K in something that will return you more than 10% [the rate you are paying as interest]. If you don't believe you can get more return, then you should take the loan for shorter period.

share|improve this answer
+1 - It's simple, if the opportunity cost of 13K is greater than 10%, then pick 20 years else try to pay it off as soon as you can. – YetAnotherUser Feb 20 '13 at 23:52

The 5 year offer looks like a fully amortizing loan, i.e. paid off in five years. And 7.42% interest.

I'd take the shorter loan at 7.42% vs the3 10% for 20 years, but of course, it's nearly triple the payment. Can you afford this?

Interesting that the longer term rate (10%) is about 3% higher than your current inflation rate. That stands to reason, as the US rate is sub-4% with inflation in the 1% range.

share|improve this answer

From my point , it is bad to take long tenure when you can repay higher amount every month. The reason is that the principle amount you pay every month is less in case of longer tenure. Hence you pay more to bank in longer tenure.

You take a loan amount of 20,00,000 INR for 10% interest rate per annum. Your interest amount is 19,00,000 INR for 15 year loan and 28,00,000 INR for 20 year loan . It indirectly means for availing 20 lakh loan, you're returning 40 lakh to bank in 15 year loan. Do you want to provide that amount to bank or keep it yourself for investing. If you want to keep it to yourself, keep your tenure as short as possible.

For full details , you can see my blog post on tenure.

share|improve this answer
Hi Siva, can you add a few more lines of detail to this answer? This has the possibility of being a good answer, but its content to link ratio is a little low. Even quoting relevant parts of your post would help. – C. Ross Jul 10 '13 at 13:02
+1 to what C. Ross said. I would also suggest learning about the formatting options available when editing posts here, so you can post links with matching meaningful titles instead of bare links. Remember, good answers get voted up. – Chris W. Rea Jul 10 '13 at 13:04

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.